[rfc-i] I-D Action: draft-iab-rfc-nonascii-01.txt

julian.reschke at greenbytes.de (Julian Reschke) Mon, 29 February 2016 21:04 UTC

From: julian.reschke at greenbytes.de (Julian Reschke)
Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 22:04:23 +0100
Subject: [rfc-i] I-D Action: draft-iab-rfc-nonascii-01.txt
In-Reply-To: <C9B7A55C-4AE4-4167-9888-400D9779A304@cisco.com>
References: <20160229170135.24798.40629.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <56D4933E.4060501@gmail.com> <C9B7A55C-4AE4-4167-9888-400D9779A304@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <56D4B257.80206@greenbytes.de>

On 2016-02-29 21:11, Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr) wrote:
> I agree that sorting is out of scope.  I'm fine with one of the drafts saying that the order of authors in the input file is maintained by the prep tool as well as the output formats.  Maybe in the framework draft?

Author names are not sorted, that is they appear in the order from the 
XML source. I think that's something we want to say in the vocabulary spec.

Best regards, Julian