IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] [Tools-discuss] contributors section & tools

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Thu, 16 July 2020 22:37 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB33C3A0DB8; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 15:37:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.862
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.862 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, LONGWORDS=2.035, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aKoO_XOB8cb5; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 15:37:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 146463A0DD0; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 15:37:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4092F40742; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 15:37:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CD30F40742 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 15:37:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x00nWoKvcR2f for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 15:37:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 697EEF40741 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 15:37:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.105] (p5089ae91.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.137.174.145]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4B78JJ2rDvzyVJ; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 00:37:04 +0200 (CEST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <25009.1594933252@localhost>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 00:37:03 +0200
Message-Id: <69BD6664-8CC0-4400-83B6-4BD356F1E45F@tzi.org>
References: <25009.1594933252@localhost>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (17F80)
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] [Tools-discuss] contributors section & tools
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: RFC Interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>, tools-discuss@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2415761191811654421=="
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

You need the -3 flag in kdrfc

Sent from mobile, sorry for terse

> On 16. Jul 2020, at 23:01, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:
> 
> 
> Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
>>>> On 2020-07-15, at 20:50, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Not sure whether xml2rfc v3 has special tags for contributors. If so, that
>>>> would solve the problem.
>>> 
>>> Scanning through rfc7991 there seems to be no enhancements in this respect.
> 
>> It does.  They are not very well documented.
> 
>> Kramdown-rfc supports them by adding a YAML entry like the authors entry:
> 
>> contributor:
>> - name: Peter Occil
>> email: poccil14 at gmail dot com
>> - name: Many More
>> org: To do
> 
> Thank you, I very much like this.
> I also noticed today that there was an IESG todo item:
>    Warren Kumari to work on acknowledging shepherds, directorate
>    reviewers in a more standardized/formal way.
>    - Added 2019-10-10 (18 telechats ago)
> 
> so, I tried this.
> 
> I had a section called "Contributors" already, in the old textual form.
> And it actually details some major contributions, so I didn't want to remove
> it, so I have slightly renamed it. ("Notable Contributions")
> 
> With just name:/email:, I get many complaints from xml2rfc:
> <string>: Line 1655: No declaration for element contact
> <string>: Line 1655: No declaration for attribute initials of element contact
> <string>: Line 1655: No declaration for attribute surname of element contact
> <string>: Line 1655: No declaration for attribute fullname of element contact
> 
> I obviously know how to solve this by putting more stuff in.
> But, the bigger problem seems to be:
> 
> <string>: Line 1614: Element section content does not follow the DTD,
> expecting ((t | figure | texttable | iref)* , section*), got (name contact
> contact contact contact contact contact contact contact contact contact
> contact contact contact)
> 
> kramdown-rfc2629-1.3.8
> xml2rfc 2.23.1
> ... upgrading to 2.46.0.
>    same result.
> 
> --
> Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
> -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email