Re: [rfc-i] The upcoming transition to xml2rfc v3

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Fri, 06 September 2019 06:11 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31BBF1208E1 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 23:11:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=gmx.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EgPMou29Kx8m for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 23:11:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD8421208A1 for <rfc-interest-archive-eekabaiReiB1@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 23:11:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B13DFB80E48; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 23:11:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3724B80E48; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 23:11:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gmx.net
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6IO60xSDJc4D; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 23:11:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.15]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A046B80E44; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 23:11:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1567750286; bh=cSu7wAUxQ1tSgGYDQswnl0UHN3PBxmhy3E77O9TAGWs=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=hg8WZB3msWhK/PuoOttrBN9oaLg2c/FhOR3EtwYNwCVS3WYcra/vEFCSiqml1LO67 uRKBgWQDrJaaBqIWOBdazadizkdxgqi2aXOqX16MHgZ9slv2tKXZvPVI/uRDIkpqoX TrEqsxSTku5KiV/TlDaECfSQg0QCg2xAoHZmcwfQ=
X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
Received: from [192.168.178.124] ([91.61.48.169]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MMk99-1i5HBi3sp5-008dW8; Fri, 06 Sep 2019 08:11:25 +0200
To: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>, 'RFC Editor' <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, 'RFC Interest' <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
References: <20190906042325.GC12952@rfc-editor.org> <04c001d56478$21b94220$652bc660$@augustcellars.com>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <5c9530d8-909b-7004-7e2e-e598efdceccd@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2019 08:11:25 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <04c001d56478$21b94220$652bc660$@augustcellars.com>
Content-Language: en-US
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:ojkqE/fRmXfu51j8+WpQwUUK2+dR5HDgVsDRw1P7oMr8uqNj2ZQ MFiK46qrbDyt5iZ0mxhFYV6yc66YVWVJcSw5xw+jKZq/y0An4vXCA4W2jw9P8md3aL7Bm1K nU5dWz1BDfd6PFYvmoDIO31C26XdOKabrOht3BkU5zn9dpQBfqwxwwxhhiLNBkrfkHMkMH1 Q+2jjeBfTNN7CO3QcKpVQ==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:91fQWwJ2WOk=:A9AOg+ARrN8J2w9vnBMlYv cwArqh5FP0SfjuQpcOqxDcyZfbJ88YmffuhtTimPeaWVvaPsuQxrCIVueaFTqsRbAdBGaGxRs dnPuMlGBgvyosTli7JnAMO6tI0tpcnfJYniLvEfGrn+iJUlVX00xghWJ+zckj+SW3vDSCiWuG HHch3QaUxqhlKJw/wfzufEv+pB09EgiqvZihnYrZF9J4m2GKxuyxE9Y+QNPV8tKJU8k4PebJQ glWcnekhCgvxLycnMpl0Za7Qb7jF70Zv7qkbQXeJA5tUbc7QaBqm6TBR8diwdN9mJD6sfF59L lhpnoemMmAEkBJABll3EImNhtxwPtcaSEornlLz4lmR/tf/LV5YoCEV/++jftrdNqHp+Bn6M0 iOplsNiAsBhLXRNtYiVSfDt6Fg9HBvEZ0m7izsYbCUPZYJVHfJF8oCkVMVW4DJv6rZ3J5488j a8GxB3DXUezKxXHCw20yuYBvH11SBWKWCHCdsC9y9R8ICB0xqU1zNBBUGwbC1aXlce9ayXjLR 1mWrC0BN6YeJN77N19TIDw+MUlo/DGdzKSKLZTeKReWhWQONFvV6LzaKrdL1FmqJurf0pxNRQ s3WABax/Mf14OEpH5vWUJXII4HkXN441mjZMBKY0nKR7vKtSrZgrDmWzXZ65ecCA0h4WJ7h82 sqSni9H5nPSaTt9flmWIiMcpjobpvQdwJnGzvyhogAZQpPlyAwIHg20jL1TJ7iq3kND7xzJe8 HJ/lpXzBPIhn4z7amPTQOzaE0JvnOS5X+IThUi0ulP4bDgq4P5iYG/4IVTB6ZXL9ePGTmLY3+ OtrR5Kiw094Vb46r52Y7PmGh0LDn8+ObbvMFthhWKZ+jOH7PWGehY6KeTP85bx9zn2S19Gif6 R1GSrOg0hDofdZAMq5JPF81jeklIBMJtJSnVGwP+1eMcPss+lt+jMsriBMpmwdgGVFBYpRy7R ACDOiOnA5BztkRgAZkptlsyGrW9osO1RsHeSdILaj2/jknE+wDmoLkNGg/o1GbioPzz4Dwjb8 6VYGy1Cvgrv+eIU3/wwkbCMIhp1NqcW81BOMdyM3did/fxc8HoPxaoH4V/aWsL8soKDmV8toe vfpibYEvtlqtB1bhZkP1f5P1GfxpNJa1N6Cea585BcuAwosCSpvk7K41XIo9YL2WZEdPLsYdp eiam0vD8ans1SDUHj/REro7oYVn2qbPxrqjY+XO8fqmfubtm081cvYHN7hg5ZmDy2skCpvQoB 86aNxHzBB7mmsN10R
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] The upcoming transition to xml2rfc v3
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: "'RFC ISE \(Adrian Farrel\)'" <rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-interest" <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

On 06.09.2019 07:58, Jim Schaad wrote:
> Will the RFC Editor potentially be editing output to make the v3 vocabulary look cleaner?  I know of a kramdown file that is having some formatting problems, at least in part due to how it is creating the xml file.
>
> Jim

Would be good to have more details. Is this a kramdown2629 issue? Is
Carsten aware?

Best regards, Julian
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest