Re: [rfc-i] Hebrew contact information example in RFC 7997

Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com> Sat, 21 January 2017 21:16 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A97971293F5 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 21 Jan 2017 13:16:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.287
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.287 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GAUZmXzrtSJ0 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 21 Jan 2017 13:16:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F2CC1293E8 for <rfc-interest-archive-eekabaiReiB1@ietf.org>; Sat, 21 Jan 2017 13:16:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CA80B801BE; Sat, 21 Jan 2017 13:16:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0C73B801BE; Sat, 21 Jan 2017 13:16:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xmwHRo5Kyd-w; Sat, 21 Jan 2017 13:16:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x242.google.com (mail-wm0-x242.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::242]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 763CFB801BA; Sat, 21 Jan 2017 13:16:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm0-x242.google.com with SMTP id r144so15873415wme.0; Sat, 21 Jan 2017 13:16:22 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=+pOJLz/WhPolBUS7JwyXKvrftnftCLy6so3R+A6LGzM=; b=Yvp5P1uVjwWwYVs7WGwT1nqr0VLHRZqHbZXUiDyrmdJddGg+1vPu9CLGv54BlJFFEf e6NxjkJxzRe2ThuwHjAqGKLMbexNDmS7L6cs00wP9ePsI3Pv/BjYPd3RrJWLWGfZ0jbC Tm12t1ji3LgLPIvwdNFK9Qj4Y1mzopmWmyebg/MTpvVsyZLglW84ajJDi6j7xiLoKngU Uu76vEQp8QW3ujOhntjatJdbrQzAz5wC9mFICdizmH0n2Cn5gYVw3Xx7XnapDmhKmGxB z8nPvKX2jGajAfVSAQ/xzDhdgSEUSNIEyPl8fbfckz1sCe2M60W/V+EzyEI0Bnk1RiKm ExvA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=+pOJLz/WhPolBUS7JwyXKvrftnftCLy6so3R+A6LGzM=; b=TqJDApKUyPYo+M9bqK6rixdKT16nb+MIG2inUu+Q/idOXZPIxP0YBtYpMAO8HX+gKE FLDuspIDoxXlMK7aseqIiAAzKhfSytZc3kINQ3/3uVx156URRHpXQgdwce2tLTH3s8lW LVmNhSIfHMgjMTzMyJIaHXVN9zmfgWO5WdMgT52iniEh7GQoBLX6Zy1JmS4u1FWgeqIo DAgEbni40LWzrYj4PzobhIJ3fdai0IeFBMcboezCmyWNGjaj/PakVU5sC8eXLyUWmahP Q9i04QWYuUiMErFKB2FmZKbfjqngguj5jeT9SHYy5t/pIgO4IVe/uX9Jo5AebE4Lb3Hh LmEQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXL4FMdkHer7HvYcvhnF2rmNZd8iP0dT6vQOvZtDI0fp/siTQZ7haTQr/Wr2faVLfQ==
X-Received: by 10.28.50.135 with SMTP id y129mr7799231wmy.2.1485033380893; Sat, 21 Jan 2017 13:16:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.14] ([46.120.57.147]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v201sm1042509wmv.4.2017.01.21.13.16.19 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 21 Jan 2017 13:16:19 -0800 (PST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
From: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <04696cbe-365d-572b-74c8-32145733e439@gmx.de>
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2017 23:16:17 +0200
Message-Id: <DBE4B400-03EB-4058-8320-05F0FF333313@gmail.com>
References: <480c6dfe-b590-abfa-0103-ac90641cd0f9@gmx.de> <00ed01d27369$0f8e9ad0$2eabd070$@gmail.com> <04696cbe-365d-572b-74c8-32145733e439@gmx.de>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Hebrew contact information example in RFC 7997
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>, rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org, RSE <rse@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

> On 21 Jan 2017, at 9:54, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
> 
> On 2017-01-20 23:03, Roni Even wrote:
>> Hi,
>> The PDF version - section 3.2 is OK
>> As for 3.9 the alignment is not perfect.  The first problem is that Hebrew is written left to right so typically we align to the left. This will probably look weird in an RFC so I would expect alignment to the right at least. As for the text itself it is OK in the pdf (not the one in the email)
>> As for the HTML version - the alignment is better but still the first line with my name is not aligned
>> This is how it would look aligned to the left
>> 
>> 
>> רוני אבן
>> וואווי
>> דוד המלך 14
>> תל אביב 64953
>> ישראל
>> Roni
> 
> Like <https://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc7997.html#n-address-information>?
> 

Yes, that one looks excellent.

I still question the value of having this block of Hebrew text in an RFC, but this is probably looks as good as it can get.

Yoav

_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest