IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] Meta decorations in generated HTML

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Thu, 26 May 2022 12:10 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30E12C180A93 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 May 2022 05:10:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1653567014; bh=EWgRTUDGRdYRygVD1k2F8rmOWTdvGXLshiKjtsB3HLA=; h=Date:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=Nvf9jF0HXGUWLEVT8mzrbOIu0EMHeklWDXB5RQ0p47K8AFyXAIsD4t2UnTU3ZAPXd 4Qp2hS6sfD1UAHWXLUv8IrsUaW76y+GxcslHfGTWcFSYa+V+DE75nIbQbSo7In3sRR /Vc8v9gr3ZAQN+OBw6oohi1eaUx16SFubPL/YCDY=
X-Mailbox-Line: From rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org Thu May 26 05:10:14 2022
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F17E7C180A7C; Thu, 26 May 2022 05:10:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1653567014; bh=EWgRTUDGRdYRygVD1k2F8rmOWTdvGXLshiKjtsB3HLA=; h=Date:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=Nvf9jF0HXGUWLEVT8mzrbOIu0EMHeklWDXB5RQ0p47K8AFyXAIsD4t2UnTU3ZAPXd 4Qp2hS6sfD1UAHWXLUv8IrsUaW76y+GxcslHfGTWcFSYa+V+DE75nIbQbSo7In3sRR /Vc8v9gr3ZAQN+OBw6oohi1eaUx16SFubPL/YCDY=
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E349C180A7C for <rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 May 2022 05:10:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.755
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.755 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-1.857, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gmx.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 07xHzaAre2B4 for <rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 May 2022 05:10:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.22]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 264AEC180A7B for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 26 May 2022 05:10:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1653566996; bh=XHajHjeBpfkNSRGj9BlgrohQr34ppvUeseYAGUWB/Is=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=BDRgIGb0Tmq0O8ESZMYjmOq0Ce9hQKJw8D16zK+ziVW288h5OXi2UjIFOFNNLujbm s/UAH/n8IYvCmbCw+29x1wpJRjpzhnBjRrXE/cu+SPMrJblFqGR1rGzMjVLG8aye3W /zgpFreL3StsGB48LqYnGfl76J5Yyvu//TMoJ7/Y=
X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
Received: from [192.168.178.20] ([91.61.48.32]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx105 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MRCOK-1oF2Zs2AoW-00NEJ2; Thu, 26 May 2022 14:09:56 +0200
Message-ID: <5afe0f29-ab5a-b79e-cad4-7c18cf8fc5d3@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2022 14:09:50 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.9.1
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Cc: "John R. Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>, rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
References: <20220525203826.8606A41A4E93@ary.qy> <f0f92d4c-8cc4-c3bb-0f0d-96c3ad422303@gmx.de> <C826D239-7CCB-404E-9591-B33C34ED82C9@tzi.org>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <C826D239-7CCB-404E-9591-B33C34ED82C9@tzi.org>
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:jl2h2ihO/nuSvGvzvP7aBzmTzMkyWiBalMc21YF9t5nwwayRdLn 7pIsWqXKz+1WEhWgC1BjE4MKMeOvoN7/DWpelboahIjf99aaDPDD6k5G6EQ0Fks5LGSS1cE BWr8uJ+R9B1XK8WRLxab5BpMPGngMJQim57xJ5O0CGwg91tnGgzjrZ1hM9Xi0uVGtvh5jOm UPjtS4ArAfz5bzz7U/N5Q==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:Nt1Zdw1qAN4=:PgLMK0DJr6PNBdZ1h+0KX0 urPj285iglnw9v+H4XsIbSMPoEckd76YybGp01zQ8qrw3kv+nDBFRdi9pdfyLQPTrpy7bnXkC Pi+B5pn9u7JbSoPt432qp+Y6Wvz8tmAKZX2nBwJzBCYSOLImsEm4faBHYfYm3dPVdYkMNLbZe 2j4MYkfOqVRNwOzHZqzQApmtvNf4jcFbOcS8hqgiBB0pJHPVs3ON2AHam58MjY73nneHTFHH2 hsu0r+tOCuS0/XKbVDJ+08HhuQ7renEe9UNCxBtr5xE7nvGpfwy+XlFKZIgCrstKy+hK8CCMi 67izr5vBfGKQXXoq8nEmUIoqPI0HQgm/tByyGGGWw7hvhYXzbVmFS+empwiQ9peCLnBAgMAMW H+rMd99XhB48JooBvi0JSzFUyJgPdGdjeIK6h4yMjRLxoE89eJFo+vUK9YdiJBd86BH+uqDtU GBC1rWjzxP04M6jFy7hqHVDxYnbwB3oYUkNRjLaaKhTKtY6uDFYq+OA7Bg5INgxtm8i+AVJAo 5bG6Cn01dlFe+2hitfFWrWewIB0Nfid28pWsqT6ApL3FP/ZKWsWaFFbkAxPasOnjhVMRPGYDG XNaCx9+TKsCbgUufDmmWpH2Y2l/nOiBxcGulMU9qMuSh8MYwh6+6i4+UU/VVDm0kxMpq/5DqX /dMwjljItoTrzKBAtsHNRC+wIMZMo8UIz2B1zoUOaZlEIE9VepFMQ5VUCIaLX4zUigAr4Vm+6 Zh8Czydoae/gviI7oxRoYIA0sBVu7UhWKMyh2HJQgjKvegKF5d44QzDtQPqEEuc60+IGWr8W1 QfVpvIuUcYxVzKVYFth1ya9RLqPLIEjJbjtsmBwS7a19ORJFljD6rJzOE1Tko5oJXKnavOMsr /nXn5RLZ7SzMRo143K3UcZ/9+sCYdlpv/x4roJsmAu8eQnoi3szGFdYiOCx0oG16D5Chfl182 xh8GNFg5197Kn6x+qrBfmQz5T2Ya/jawBpT9Q36CxjfRz7FDbom58/GkEpSRc//x6R1gqS3u2 VWDSm0xdCtWn699oRnvlHguaAJzcxpiezJT+u/amq8/45dV/V3ah47s1JlYoSZCPJqNpYv8vQ udIxrkl5XQWI9R3kR7B7rlPWJEfpVKnOzBRjl2Nm/Et3N7Y8qiRvsjpZw==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfc-interest/kv4U0OIhSABqT7l5EYZaFlcbF5o>
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Meta decorations in generated HTML
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

Am 26.05.2022 um 08:30 schrieb Carsten Bormann:
> On 26. May 2022, at 07:43, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
>>
>> They duplicate a lot of information that is elsewhere, so I think it
>> would be good to minimize the amount of duplication.
>
> But then, they are buried in inscrutable HTML boilerplate anyway, so I think the need to minimize is somewhat weak.
> The need to get indexed prevails, at least from my point of view.

Absolutely. It would just be nice to understand what Google Scholar
actually *needs* (their intransparency is really mind boggling).

> (That doesn’t mean dumping in the kitchen sink, but only what we know that works.)
>
> Grüße, Carsten


Best regards, Julian

_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email