Re: [rfc-i] Meta decorations in generated HTML

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org> Fri, 27 May 2022 18:16 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8748BC1850D4 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 May 2022 11:16:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1653675409; bh=K5MyMB6eZunvNzBdtfIJkjeB/IA5MitGD/njW+1g23E=; h=To:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From; b=Y/18MzgNQrWlFi9GSyUJPZfgwNNutT7oOdIq69kE2DEnAkVjcrwkMp82812Rwklqq lS+aJwA9wprZcOQQZwaz/h1NlNwvn1RrkaidfYVgPn7Fftmji0YCarH/KKIxdu2/ev mfAexFjHBqS6IvoJSvQCcdXmCDS+MBGS87/SV9iI=
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64342C1594B9; Fri, 27 May 2022 11:16:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1653675409; bh=K5MyMB6eZunvNzBdtfIJkjeB/IA5MitGD/njW+1g23E=; h=From:To:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=U2eEIc88D0s6VWp0qP07nvZLGQ5wcGvQ7K7gWeOjTvfUu/KkTAuLawMHACQ3ek4qG 8slOjBbovpPqEiUhR/U1LQo0YdEcs9UMVTxj1jzeGfK4V75gQ2cTRufSqZUUsWK/3o qSb2b3+hglsSX8qmGhAFffMUTDwO1HCX/R1crLQE=
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5200C1594B9 for <rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 May 2022 11:16:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.671
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.671 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.575, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pGlaejWCyGq5 for <rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 May 2022 11:16:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9005:57f::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFEA9C1594A8 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Fri, 27 May 2022 11:16:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050102.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050102.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 24RFrIQU022903; Fri, 27 May 2022 19:16:43 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=lZ1hD+3BGVwI9hVB9Y9fQNOx52cFzSvEkg1VMMO2ADo=; b=m1McHyLRuPqh8kHyfd0iKPIRI0cmZvrTZVp7LMdiHLFCFKGuCTl5l8tf5E7CQ/GwP2e2 mjlPmuoYKVhQu/oskoHDVnUgQ4lg63GpZrEQdCrETTcr3ITbivT1LDQsXZsRDooIQjHU 7ZcUBPCvxHUniqTNin92RPvKjlii66RRWeeyVgIEAcr/HJ+Z0JoEQfjvI2Fb7iiVN8n0 rjz9F+KPNVtesalgwWvR/vj1/YKGcVrxmQ5NKX/5Zc6cim9v+5IS4IIOz7DnOffu0kZV NlyV2+AKQLrJR9yVMCkPnqIdRmlgGtZ4OGDVt3dOeXQ/pmOFHf8/tOQPA5RK0nFDdTEA Kw==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint6 (prod-mail-ppoint6.akamai.com [184.51.33.61] (may be forged)) by m0050102.ppops.net-00190b01. (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3g93vefqnh-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 27 May 2022 19:16:42 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint6.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint6.akamai.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 24RI59vs005893; Fri, 27 May 2022 14:16:42 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.91.23]) by prod-mail-ppoint6.akamai.com with ESMTP id 3g9khk43uu-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 27 May 2022 14:16:42 -0400
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB4.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.165.122) by usma1ex-dag4mb2.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.91.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384) id 15.2.986.22; Fri, 27 May 2022 14:16:41 -0400
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB3.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.165.121) by ustx2ex-dag1mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.165.122) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.36; Fri, 27 May 2022 13:16:40 -0500
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB3.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.121]) by ustx2ex-dag1mb3.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.121]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.036; Fri, 27 May 2022 13:16:40 -0500
To: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, "rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org" <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
Thread-Topic: [rfc-i] Meta decorations in generated HTML
Thread-Index: AQHYb8+qM4k1gMQX1kuUQ83+luhZXq0vT/qAgAES+4CAAJhrAIAADREAgABewACAACPYgIABj1qAgAANioCAAA/EAIAAEpyA///SpYA=
Date: Fri, 27 May 2022 18:16:39 +0000
Message-ID: <C7A43071-9251-4281-9835-E179C1E2B39A@akamai.com>
References: <20220525203826.8606A41A4E93@ary.qy> <f0f92d4c-8cc4-c3bb-0f0d-96c3ad422303@gmx.de> <C826D239-7CCB-404E-9591-B33C34ED82C9@tzi.org> <5afe0f29-ab5a-b79e-cad4-7c18cf8fc5d3@gmx.de> <0ab66d2e-aa7d-eb17-83dc-2774e9d021a7@taugh.com> <27659.1653660447@localhost> <d603174c-db26-4fcb-0a60-a1f8b714c951@taugh.com> <29605.1653666740@localhost> <88f7f0a7-be8b-cefe-1ee7-2b8a158cc788@taugh.com>
In-Reply-To: <88f7f0a7-be8b-cefe-1ee7-2b8a158cc788@taugh.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.61.22050700
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.27.164.43]
Content-ID: <8320CF467488DA4D8C12F540BDEAB802@akamai.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.486, 18.0.874 definitions=2022-05-27_05:2022-05-27, 2022-05-27 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlxlogscore=702 bulkscore=0 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2204290000 definitions=main-2205270088
X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: Mlf8ENMoEJdmsC4kOZl07T3NkJcIPJkQ
X-Proofpoint-GUID: Mlf8ENMoEJdmsC4kOZl07T3NkJcIPJkQ
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.874,Hydra:6.0.486,FMLib:17.11.64.514 definitions=2022-05-27_05,2022-05-27_01,2022-02-23_01
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 lowpriorityscore=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 impostorscore=0 suspectscore=0 adultscore=0 clxscore=1015 priorityscore=1501 mlxlogscore=721 bulkscore=0 mlxscore=0 malwarescore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2204290000 definitions=main-2205270089
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfc-interest/lTwLhQgD49Z1poislH8XDr1F10c>
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Meta decorations in generated HTML
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>

    > I might post
    > a copy on a web site devoted to that technology for instance, and it would be
    > good if it re-inforced rfc-editor.org as the canonical source, rather than
    > diluted it.

Since the RPC knows what the RFC number will be, having the tools add
	<meta name="source" content="https://rfc-editor/rfc/420/">
Seems pretty simple.  I do not know if it is worthwhile or not.  I am sure that the "source" isn't ideal :)


_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest