Re: [rfc-i] Meta decorations in generated HTML

Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> Wed, 25 May 2022 03:32 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6ECDC2B6308 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 May 2022 20:32:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1653449569; bh=1ypFbDCpJGGgWD1D3C/ph2LY1zSVyMyegj8fG/DGDQw=; h=From:Date:References:Cc:In-Reply-To:To:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=zAy4rgSAPWsLY5QDVT3ecsMVj0BlRpNfZBsrcXsbNLz9xjCxpEgWAt1vtsJGG5gAl 5Tm4VM0HXaxpuIH9LEzFJ4amJFyaNFDECsX2Xd5srDU+NKTY95gBPOLtv6d7AuZ9Gh 6Z/pcGYjMhK3Q8Q4MWpgzkf2sUGRJ6aGshi82XUI=
X-Mailbox-Line: From rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org Tue May 24 20:32:49 2022
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5C75C073296; Tue, 24 May 2022 20:32:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1653449569; bh=1ypFbDCpJGGgWD1D3C/ph2LY1zSVyMyegj8fG/DGDQw=; h=From:Date:References:Cc:In-Reply-To:To:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=zAy4rgSAPWsLY5QDVT3ecsMVj0BlRpNfZBsrcXsbNLz9xjCxpEgWAt1vtsJGG5gAl 5Tm4VM0HXaxpuIH9LEzFJ4amJFyaNFDECsX2Xd5srDU+NKTY95gBPOLtv6d7AuZ9Gh 6Z/pcGYjMhK3Q8Q4MWpgzkf2sUGRJ6aGshi82XUI=
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 267A1C073296 for <rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 May 2022 20:32:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=eggert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4SPdYZr0d5AL for <rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 May 2022 20:32:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.eggert.org (mail.eggert.org [91.190.195.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25733C073260 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 24 May 2022 20:32:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:9880:ce17:3845:f60f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.eggert.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E4B021D306E; Wed, 25 May 2022 06:32:31 +0300 (EEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=eggert.org; s=dkim; t=1653449551; bh=TIMTdDPHlO/7lrsM95IUmFQ3l3x9xl7/0In1NsvrHFs=; h=From:Subject:Date:References:Cc:In-Reply-To:To; b=NpvyAygsOx+MjVjF3Y1sD/qRGzMRw/Wr8L3iBW2EBz8gSs4IaJKYlC5MbBbdt6fKy 5VjFIUo3KfAKvKuLyh3OwHZIz4+HkdU3GOwOkKOmns09aQqLm/u73dWdsABCvIA3Vo FhHMBI+3PGOM9xhqOkoelOvXQxd+jflE1bVhzaDc=
From: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Wed, 25 May 2022 06:32:21 +0300
Message-Id: <7FC439B8-9301-4D4C-BF4C-5F85C9A494A8@eggert.org>
References: <8297ac0d-56dd-1ec7-9baf-d0cd52c0076b@taugh.com>
Cc: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
In-Reply-To: <8297ac0d-56dd-1ec7-9baf-d0cd52c0076b@taugh.com>
To: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
X-MailScanner-ID: E4B021D306E.A221C
X-MailScanner: Not scanned: please contact your Internet E-Mail Service Provider for details
X-MailScanner-From: lars@eggert.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfc-interest/lWCNcjld2K958wxKDuhIEGTBOkQ>
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Meta decorations in generated HTML
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

Yes and yes, personally 

-- 
Sent from a mobile device; please excuse typos.

> On May 25, 2022, at 03:38, John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:
> 
> Do we agree that we want the OG tags?  We already agreed on the Google Scholar tags about a decade ago but it took a while to get around to it.
> 
> If we like the OG tags, should I arrange to add them to the HTMLized versions of pre-XML RFCs?

_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest