IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] why can't we use git? Re: Wrong Internet search results for new RFCs

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Wed, 04 May 2022 17:55 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BFC3C159A39 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 May 2022 10:55:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1651686956; bh=Czf4bH6Hx8Mit6q2IV6mlxlrtGMfRrMz8ypsr0BA/7c=; h=Date:To:References:From:In-Reply-To:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=FbwHlhBbWxyqw9+jOlKhHkdAOHUvAALx8Nkh9/AvIkcQ9EZIj7aGcBS6MGBg9ZLWH OLXDR3t8EpsmUzPXUBdvVT9f+I4fb763jphiGV0cOL4taYWwu20Vdy3RMM/L61oQ1B Ge2HUzu4d3vE0N9erbFwI9dQFCWq9/OjMUXBjuR0=
X-Mailbox-Line: From rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org Wed May 4 10:55:56 2022
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E816C1595E5; Wed, 4 May 2022 10:55:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1651686956; bh=Czf4bH6Hx8Mit6q2IV6mlxlrtGMfRrMz8ypsr0BA/7c=; h=Date:To:References:From:In-Reply-To:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=FbwHlhBbWxyqw9+jOlKhHkdAOHUvAALx8Nkh9/AvIkcQ9EZIj7aGcBS6MGBg9ZLWH OLXDR3t8EpsmUzPXUBdvVT9f+I4fb763jphiGV0cOL4taYWwu20Vdy3RMM/L61oQ1B Ge2HUzu4d3vE0N9erbFwI9dQFCWq9/OjMUXBjuR0=
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DA34C1595E5 for <rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 May 2022 10:55:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.755
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.755 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-1.857, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gmx.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8o92kvbeuUta for <rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 May 2022 10:55:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.15]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E02F5C159526 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 4 May 2022 10:54:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1651686865; bh=u8GstT/PcDT63KY86S5IEiYwcKkVfWyP+uU/ZhX9Gvo=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=InesSaNTpuz4bBIzj2d4CUdOWWYfmqvRqbK/oW9nX6SX9KPK/u1vIdYjC/hiBDLGd hHo0mpZFsfSPGBILHgfKe08MGVdaqwL2LOkxDtVRvzf59Z0EkvPCilYxg5h+V3ALqG nh7FMgEysKYl1Oq294KO85FOodcvBl+GXzy1Tvw0=
X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
Received: from [192.168.178.20] ([84.171.153.213]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx005 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1Mf0BM-1oIax03Hxa-00gc5B for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 04 May 2022 19:54:24 +0200
Message-ID: <a047b767-6f60-6152-34b8-1777e899a629@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 04 May 2022 19:54:21 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.8.1
To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
References: <20220503021720.69EDC3F4BACA@ary.qy> <2f655efd-603b-ebef-bb01-3859571dbd79@nostrum.com> <20129.1651596111@localhost> <5F87F7FD-B3E3-46B3-B03A-EA7BEF58D179@akamai.com> <9711.1651614687@localhost> <7F237E0E-7170-449D-B530-9BDBDED31EDF@akamai.com> <22818.1651671978@localhost> <defeb4c3-06b7-4610-763a-9919ee1ab181@lear.ch> <24895.1651678642@localhost>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <24895.1651678642@localhost>
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:UO3YNFZ82B2ahmzWoDFQ7uByRMWGtukIROwo3/vSwX8UZbQkPBU tQR0LgkoTKyZVYdiruYKE51751/YkwPJ/FXu9KOvxdS5TX8QRGzS7gJVU/yoXbLlkbs0RnV 0ixOZTffvovaMw8nYCmhBO1AVAIEufXWfbbp0gLd9PerDaMHBRaOo/QiDm9jSk17UmKyHuY /V4MFCR2rK/FN9ZjWIHrA==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:tMMpznXHgH0=:9SjuduSM0iwrpKLLrcLVUR 9ywFSnnMgQogFwru/5djuhFyv7X082w/HMrNKuUt1fcUcEJVEmB/tyiyCRBG8xBzXaBCEbFFH /GLbK3qZv/n+9QCr7wUCg3Mz2dYHQyl5+P/YZmaHay8WsGDNw1Ze629isrGR2FcwhG7Tx2YH3 n79gqf/B8fhKiD+Jy0TtZEkYFSS+5euAs0Dg8IZTT9Y6OwYp0oh8Og5qEDDRkctAzEU0SMLQx 798cC29TBKdLyyfBpcJKT6+Z6g2PoFOh9JVIF6hcAYbCoIKe7es6l3SHS7fRc/SrbLo5uQyRq J3KkjCyflsq6Gt/KeR+vd67s1mlZvzPjNcZdztaRpK7aK/XFY6gMmWJdab6O9ftJqZ/4on7Sz xfhB4zd7D/WWSDNE+bvjYmLDZBSo1mS5moGKE/zHXpmZkwD8KHuwMpJc9JnAM5/bZntVkv78T rB2wsV9DNExJZAdnRvAfXzKPqk7IBHa1q4/KyS2AdZOL2yvHkkVtOQX3s4BHghpVb+3aZzldf o3ncdG8G7ujQvnj4x3SlgDbW2xPYZ/pS9oHdpi1uyjZHUk79dYJT22VUkuDuVO1nPvuJe9aHN UTvEc0wOXvloBQh6qk+doALBzw4+lC4gGKamKpdSkh7AVoaBdlzFA0l1ZGCPqWg8BuZ8awif2 fTciZVHPxGlf1DgXBqkAecZLsJEyqmXYtlz+rKwUXEx07lQlj+DUUgqEp2U7bDbjfopHh54YQ PEzqDZwYF3ZmtCXhKSTWdvF+LzCd9QP2a8vAUsilsEorRT+ueRIxLpGxH6tGY3xKSTZuf+s2g 039Es9CRQB8xrEiuTiyrarWYCSJdSpWb0yokwJHjp5vr37hZjudZkjzqDxrl2EVtg7QFTHCZk ISbQMaJ79qsNg4GDuy/zw2xAXc/hTAS6mNfGvNfl6Beciqmr3L0DiNWWuB0plhMloBxs48ahq Zc5V1k9Bb3yKafxCyXqte2PCFukJzoaaMAgt1SZD7dtofqVXX/TXi7iBX61ILBLrNBieLVf/j +w/wmf2rPQc0nbulybhhIBrJ41KAEwkTQgevHqQgJlGwicT9w4E7PKV1HkbXtv8OWuD2hE23N AUv4wyJeibfWAQ=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfc-interest/leVRENqljbSpph87Df5Girhx4HE>
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] why can't we use git? Re: Wrong Internet search results for new RFCs
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

Am 04.05.2022 um 17:37 schrieb Michael Richardson:
 > ...> 2) there are obscure crawlers which do not respect robots.txt.
John feels that this
> isn't our problem, but I somewhat disagree.  I think that until we have
> defined the public workflow, that we should make sure that our current
> workflow is actually is as private as authors and editors expect.
> ...

FWIW, I don't expect the workflow to be private at all.

Best regards, Julian

_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email