IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] [Tools-discuss] contributors section & tools

John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Thu, 16 July 2020 18:35 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 134863A0954; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 11:35:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1536-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=iecc.com header.b=UWgkbPEe; dkim=fail (1536-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=taugh.com header.b=aChV1rNo
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0lUucGRgI2Q4; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 11:35:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A10EA3A0778; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 11:35:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87423F4074E; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 11:35:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43FF4F4074E for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 11:35:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=UWgkbPEe; dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=aChV1rNo
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3vsKuP1qKpND for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 11:35:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2787F40745 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 11:35:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 35534 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2020 18:35:32 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=8ac9.5f109df4.k2007; i=johnl-iecc.com@submit.iecc.com; bh=O+FQcC2+RJn22ATVnPVf5SIUEFiEvoUpHJxwQ20duVY=; b=UWgkbPEeD0admEubP7nPRHqoWoqM9xDG0MA8Gxwf0n8GHWhXb2iHoxEwzi6+aa0RyT0dWWepUOtLuW1bTqbpnqLyG5fIUdzlG0pTjFCD6NmxQymc0ptOxGCz3+xONynkcKdFDQMiZ+VJDIbnUUdUHfo2sv1A/btX/HyNCL3A5+c58pwGw+r2XEZdYEUij8OQRwEh9fm90uYgGDtHRmR4qk8Uf3nRvjEGoL3+q+lWByq/AecDUMBE8RVFmYWRSaVs
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=8ac9.5f109df4.k2007; olt=johnl-iecc.com@submit.iecc.com; bh=O+FQcC2+RJn22ATVnPVf5SIUEFiEvoUpHJxwQ20duVY=; b=aChV1rNokTzhK0R70eAWxwGc/dh0hu2J50p7G9jWiFfc7Eh3pLdmwxdast9UqN4uZi0WwV/mRerHaRlhEWjcrT15Hm8V+vVdYMF+kzuyV+tp1baKbx6Dd2xAHqEfwLQnWFq0++v19fK/1+k9TgbvYHc33V6KQnggsbjtxRvqsDhLc1lRtxrCoMroVhmzwxlBGwY3XTK2U8/c+dReiO6jalt4nEkgV8vKl74bltm+J4DiFIvEBWFbuh8lF1NWdTUx
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPSA (TLS1.3 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD, johnl@iecc.com) via TCP6; 16 Jul 2020 18:35:31 -0000
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2020 14:35:31 -0400
Message-ID: <dadece0-3d36-65d5-c720-7776964aea6b@taugh.com>
From: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <20200716182154.GE35840@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
References: <7c0eeb4-f21-c797-f523-b2724952b013@taugh.com> <436b0489-9b74-985c-8f54-7a6de410cca2@gmx.de> <20200716182154.GE35840@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="0-865466203-1594924532=:72561"
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] [Tools-discuss] contributors section & tools
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

> I would recommend to start updating the URL on https://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/
> from RFC7991 to whatever would be the best place to look for the current
> supported grammar. This is the place where i think everbody will go looking
> for what grammar there is, and "contact" is not in RFC7991.

The only place the actual grammar appears is in xml2rfc and the copy at 
the website below.  Julian and I are slowly updating RFC 7991 at
https://github.com/rfc-format/draft-iab-xml2rfc-v3-bis

R's,
John

> On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 08:03:00PM +0200, Julian Reschke wrote:
>> On 16.07.2020 18:16, John R Levine wrote:
>>> In article <20200716013048.GB35840@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
>>> you write:
>>>>
>>>> Nice. Who'd know v3 had undocumented features ;-))
>>>
>>> Way too many.  The actual grammar used in published RFCs is here:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/rfc-format/v3grammar
>>>
>>> There are five versions, each intended to be backward compatible with
>>> the previous ones.
>>> ...
>>
>> Well, we could (a) publish the updated RFC7991bis draft, and (b) try to
>> get more people involved into revising it.
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email