Re: [rfc-i] documents in court, was Request for feedback: the new CSS
Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com> Wed, 07 December 2016 05:28 UTC
Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6197129671
for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Tue, 6 Dec 2016 21:28:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.987
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.987 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3,
RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001,
T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key)
reason="fail (message has been altered)"
header.d=adobe.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id AyAYjzNRaWsI
for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Tue, 6 Dec 2016 21:28:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DAEED12966C
for <rfc-interest-archive-eekabaiReiB1@ietf.org>;
Tue, 6 Dec 2016 21:28:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1])
by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 906D5B80280;
Tue, 6 Dec 2016 21:28:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6DF8B80280
for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 6 Dec 2016 21:28:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
header.d=adobe.com
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id HpiYbZs2tA0z for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>;
Tue, 6 Dec 2016 21:28:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from NAM02-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com
(mail-sn1nam02on0059.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.36.59])
by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6A4AB8026D
for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 6 Dec 2016 21:28:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=adobe.com;
s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version;
bh=PVWYlCBKEl0UM+LYTliP/gpJqkyYDhtVDnQIDGOUf6E=;
b=oELsQvtGAuS9vP+SaEoXx8R41xoT8pfNrNx5JhEUyJ8AL748S7p98CfrzfJEi6DSG1Qugxfjs2j3vSv8/T6ijGWpfkdwiiwp7PweNrvnsloHeXuqgdxH+fd9FO0a3IgVZ1MNyhslTO/JnDS6ukAyh0WeeZG53QF5KxNA7ZoHsvE=
Received: from CY1PR0201MB1530.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (10.163.139.21) by
CY1PR0201MB1530.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (10.163.139.21) with Microsoft SMTP
Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id
15.1.761.9; Wed, 7 Dec 2016 05:28:45 +0000
Received: from CY1PR0201MB1530.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([10.163.139.21]) by
CY1PR0201MB1530.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([10.163.139.21]) with
mapi id 15.01.0761.018; Wed, 7 Dec 2016 05:28:45 +0000
From: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
To: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, "Scott O. Bradner" <sob@sobco.com>
Thread-Topic: [rfc-i] documents in court, was Request for feedback: the new CSS
Thread-Index: AQHST1naS0UxWvFAukuM1ZJpnUC9kKD79Fmg
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2016 05:28:45 +0000
Message-ID: <CY1PR0201MB1530FFD247A6AEBF913E38ABC3850@CY1PR0201MB1530.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
References: <20161205193246.24386.qmail@ary.lan>
<751B147C-3F6D-45FF-BCA0-557F2C2CBB4C@sobco.com>
<BECB977D-8B30-488B-9517-D562C85129A6@sobco.com>
<alpine.OSX.2.11.1612051941080.78142@ary.qy>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.11.1612051941080.78142@ary.qy>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is )
smtp.mailfrom=masinter@adobe.com;
x-originating-ip: [50.184.24.49]
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 76f3f402-e347-4433-6405-08d41e61e9fc
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(22001);
SRVR:CY1PR0201MB1530;
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; CY1PR0201MB1530;
7:F2stPuJljja0hLNwMd1H639S7zkGnXB9NijUKstd+pMDq7999ufg+S0Tj/YlZoNT40goCtYASdUaKc+ReCD+OYSv6kfQbiVCIaXgmZ4qbpqh2rWTkmWTuysW0LXk/TbunnRgluPQmQqxGL7rBkeFgX0odFq3ryoZExdV3V//bI5I3Tjf8gZAIal/qE+VAUBrfzJjPv/AsWofIX8kkAn/slCvMdMJARtVYTR/N96x8+gOdZ0NWEJ50gXrfbV5xRHkVJ7bS0wd2xHrxbBcHCl5LCvYYsQ5Ung9MlPMiE4C2m3VK6RdgKQtOQzFtmNGE8oIUWBPMxypLzrbrcArBGV72zWhTrlXJNQhZQajnT/hGsM4VB8jMcz0LOmoA5PptajSVwVECsugqUiZtIuKhYLkRby5ektFQWN1GT4x0uYIrb7u3G3MwljDILL1gzigTrzTWHJ1mPy81Y+KBFK/m2sPeQ==
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <CY1PR0201MB1530517A321A1F13CBC41EDCC3850@CY1PR0201MB1530.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0;
RULEID:(61425038)(6040375)(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(3002001)(10201501046)(6055026)(61426038)(61427038)(6041248)(20161123560025)(20161123555025)(20161123562025)(20161123564025)(20161123558021)(6072148);
SRVR:CY1PR0201MB1530; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:CY1PR0201MB1530;
x-forefront-prvs: 01494FA7F7
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM;
SFS:(10009020)(6009001)(7916002)(189002)(199003)(2906002)(92566002)(33656002)(39840400001)(39860400001)(39850400001)(66066001)(106116001)(68736007)(9686002)(3280700002)(3660700001)(39410400001)(38730400001)(86362001)(6506006)(77096006)(39450400002)(229853002)(2900100001)(4326007)(8936002)(93886004)(102836003)(6116002)(3846002)(76576001)(81166006)(74316002)(81156014)(189998001)(122556002)(8676002)(5660300001)(105586002)(54356999)(76176999)(50986999)(99286002)(7696004)(101416001)(7846002)(5001770100001)(97736004)(305945005)(7736002)(558084003)(8990500004)(2950100002)(10090500001)(106356001);
DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:CY1PR0201MB1530;
H:CY1PR0201MB1530.namprd02.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords;
MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: adobe.com does not designate
permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: adobe.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 07 Dec 2016 05:28:45.0644 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: fa7b1b5a-7b34-4387-94ae-d2c178decee1
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CY1PR0201MB1530
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] documents in court, was Request for feedback: the new CSS
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions."
<rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>,
<mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>,
<mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: "rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org" <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-interest" <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
> Federal court we've looked at stuff on screens. But I still think it'd be > adequate to send them the XML and PDF and tell them we're pretty > sure they say the same thing. Does it help in this case that the XML will be *in* the PDF? At least to reduce the risk of sending things that don't match? _______________________________________________ rfc-interest mailing list rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest
- [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Ted Lemon
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Ted Lemon
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Dan York
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Russ Housley
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Adrian Farrel
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Yoav Nir
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Martin Thomson
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Joe Hildebrand
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Carsten Bormann
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS John Levine
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS John R Levine
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS John R Levine
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Russ Housley
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Scott O. Bradner
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS John Levine
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Scott O. Bradner
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Scott O. Bradner
- Re: [rfc-i] documents in court, was Request for f… John R Levine
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [rfc-i] documents in court, was Request for f… Larry Masinter
- Re: [rfc-i] documents in court, was Request for f… John R Levine
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Martin Thomson
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Julian Reschke