Re: [rfc-i] <format> element

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Mon, 22 February 2021 08:17 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46CB63A0E29; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 00:17:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (body has been altered)" header.d=gmx.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sN_nCjOT3FN8; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 00:17:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C39B93A0E28; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 00:17:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C785F407CA; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 00:17:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93963F407CA for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 00:17:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gmx.net
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C-kcZbF-v7ty for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 00:17:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.18]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4900EF407C9 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 00:17:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1613981819; bh=IN+aowbzhjbWXv/8ttYP8nkrHudLjkaOVcTZCfv2ncg=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=bY5mn3bFRMWD8nfVmqGCdv8u8mjr4vksiho7WDXQaEknrDFgR1BKoPuwAeMTTloG5 7df7D67nbrlzjxIxoqK6P4cP5wN+sMU+DYTjTSuEEc/q9W2CpF874GkW7OJDpJO8vW zfecAxknjgxRfJ+s4E/N5IJOjwGO9li8d2/7O3us=
X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
Received: from [192.168.178.182] ([91.61.48.1]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx005 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1N0XCw-1m1goJ287I-00wRTh; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 09:16:59 +0100
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
References: <03fab698-8c03-a5be-303b-cc6f5573f0c3@gmx.de> <83A120E5-A1A3-408B-97F6-046C9B0BF76B@tzi.org>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <5b092e47-cac7-293b-46dc-405ba50f4eb0@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 09:16:57 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <83A120E5-A1A3-408B-97F6-046C9B0BF76B@tzi.org>
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:dRMll6nhpTvFg9N107UozJKgjGnQuPUKvVsEGRUMNyr6Y7WoSIN UMfhXJvoY2tZ0gUW5L91vjEuAm09U/qjHkpYmkZGbYM3RavMSyfGnoZdHNB88SsQCwcwaa+ pM7qLBVUIKIhoOohPiVQXsa0R+XlPsBmFLSLSny7zgspTgAtEou1zojhEZb8m8iZPDa2VPR TXsEtKM7CLX2sXwSr2P+w==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:cbuH56Sxylw=:/BQ4k+0CjGfx6ozlj/NSvE h1nDJioJ/Re5PevOaKi9kMFpD7hrrr1231A+rPd2+hR9RSnzGp4xX3Ql8fDcWelo1lHWZzDFO 5/06Jc/Zc3rOBvHEdjZ4GnRUtsBLtmDE+p6Epfk0dmQqrtCkBQ7oAoNGO2M017aYt5t9zwml+ GTnCgfCBYwWtxOLUaA/Q0VWPqmkUwS6d4TT6Hg5ISLVbgxic0x9KIbDBD+qQ5+oW6V/lyHK6Y uRkTdV3fr9zYEXo1TIkMI6QEhQXanGsj1BGK1qFln+MYlqh6l6M/dUTToAg/jpUsfYrCYsrzq 6pIYJDqj7LBCJvImp9x1lpmGYe6RS5vOCbXc8h6/Z4nSPvh28M5dcvPYAN9PSlp4onHvdu8l0 sgLm3DHa4l9zJMOVfv2506W05x+bZZw1z55/y0Vg0YK5/iRG5/8vSv9JqX4FCbB6GUiMkai2Z GFTwTaXC3Mlk+afUi2dPkJKrbL0yMA+/MgIR7Gz4mMyDdh4A6Zq9TwRtZ6jpKM3F2NlUtSeN5 Efwrr5mNSmNJ/0mzOJGEvx04M9L0GErtpv9LZQCvxWLrM5T+IwdsBAl4xWSsJSq3W/3pvyhQP Gv3618qwZXpkbLSYtHbwHeTUmgukqYhhdsxLc/snP5KuqYkQp/q/NOBRoUeof+KzmYgDMZEZi /1ymnJVazNOXcJn40F6MD0sgOe+2dy1+UhU5APmfz53tcOWFqUQgRTBH6+RoD26QIO0jJT2vv zvy379e7FLbR1Jb2IjMQZKVH+Lx/kjG7grPOOQpD/z++/PhL0R0PrLWUNPMt5anMfvXOOpILY ViRlpsBGvLxOKr1Wu6iKTKYLBOL1ACGIjDky8MQeUAowB0XmfgOYZfhTtdVq0tTiyjdhfcT6+ K/Xsq2TGkm8MvDsTKbQA==
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] <format> element
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: "rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org" <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-interest" <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

Am 22.02.2021 um 08:54 schrieb Carsten Bormann:
> On 22. Feb 2021, at 08:23, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de
> <mailto:julian.reschke@gmx.de>> wrote:
>>
>> Recommendations:
>
> OK, these are pretty obvious when the goal is to implement RFC 7991.
>
> I’m actually more interested what v3.next should say.
>
> Putting the target links into an element has the advantage that one can
> have multiple links.
> I think we have run into the need to do that in several places,
>
> Grüße, Carsten

There's always <annotation> into which you can put any kind of prose.

Best regards, Julian
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest