[rfc-i] DOIs redux
brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com (Brian E Carpenter) Thu, 25 August 2016 20:06 UTC
From: brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com (Brian E Carpenter)
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 08:06:10 +1200
Subject: [rfc-i] DOIs redux
Message-ID: <8537fa85-475c-ee20-a24f-26f10977980e@gmail.com>
Hi, There's a ticket open for xml2rfc that starts: > Because RFCs now have DOI numbers, the reference sections in RFCs are now > supposed to include DOIs for all references for which they have been > assigned... I don't see why that follows. Has the RFC Editor actually got a policy on this? It isn't a trivial requirement to support this automatically in xml2rfc (or to insert manually, for that matter). Regards Brian Carpenter
- [rfc-i] DOIs redux Brian E Carpenter
- [rfc-i] DOIs redux HANSEN, TONY L
- [rfc-i] DOIs redux Brian E Carpenter
- [rfc-i] DOIs redux Heather Flanagan RFC Series Editor
- [rfc-i] DOIs redux Brian E Carpenter
- [rfc-i] DOIs redux Martin J. Dürst
- [rfc-i] DOIs redux Brian E Carpenter
- [rfc-i] DOIs redux John Levine
- [rfc-i] DOIs redux Paul Kyzivat
- [rfc-i] DOIs redux Eggert, Lars
- [rfc-i] DOIs redux HANSEN, TONY L
- [rfc-i] DOIs redux Eggert, Lars
- [rfc-i] DOIs redux Andrew G. Malis
- [rfc-i] DOIs redux Brian E Carpenter