Re: [rfc-i] [IAB] [Rsoc] Archival format to rfc-interest and the IAB

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Tue, 03 March 2020 05:35 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8AD73A18B6 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 21:35:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.65
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.65 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t_YccrNpi3ri for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 21:35:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F40E63A18B3 for <rfc-interest-archive-SieQuei0be@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 21:35:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ECDBF40722; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 21:35:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 664DAF40722 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 21:35:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l7tjUw-O7pVF for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 21:35:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29C0BF4071E for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 21:35:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.217.147] (p5089AC90.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.137.172.144]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 48Wm1l2CFxz18BL; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 06:35:23 +0100 (CET)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3608.60.0.2.5\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <11096fe0-dc88-c8d7-79e3-17d5d0f9d474@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2020 06:35:22 +0100
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 604906522.7939889-4f6e3da3a41dc93c3b097c00a24994a3
Message-Id: <ED33CB77-22C9-4525-8A30-8FF7DD6492FE@tzi.org>
References: <57ce444e-4ee9-26c5-9e76-ae6906e69159@gmail.com> <52BA75DF-6D58-4BF1-953F-1911F301DB20@encrypted.net> <8f3e62b9-03ff-9fc2-bef9-a341ce7ca897@gmail.com> <CA+9kkMBm7dH05mks2mREWO+n4A+f_m=MBC6pEicp=VVrmg6VKA@mail.gmail.com> <4e426227-a7b6-b4d0-8333-aa92d679f03b@mozilla.com> <1d6af0d5-a2c2-b239-43fd-7c937f06ccb2@gmail.com> <alpine.OSX.2.22.407.2002210838240.88568@ary.local> <165f02c8-3573-9454-ed98-efd7d3764d0f@gmx.de> <CANk3-NBv3Y+-G8VSt-M=NgShfjbvz+gsQTPtKUAsr3hBarW7Hg@mail.gmail.com> <10ea86bd-053c-37d3-2966-21a8187748d5@levkowetz.com> <11096fe0-dc88-c8d7-79e3-17d5d0f9d474@gmx.de>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.60.0.2.5)
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] [IAB] [Rsoc] Archival format to rfc-interest and the IAB
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: Wes Hardaker <hardaker@isi.edu>, RFC Interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>, RSOC <rsoc@iab.org>, "John R. Levine" <johnl@iecc.com>, Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>, Internet Architecture Board <iab@iab.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-interest" <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

> obstructionist

I think this was a matter of perceived tone as much as content.

Maybe because I’m a Northern German, too, I did not perceive the tone as obstructionist, more like as the way we tend to do work in this part of the world.

I was surprised to learn that several participants in the discussion had a different perception.  

I am no longer surprised by such surprises; I have long since learned that these differences in perception need to be managed to maintain a functional (and pleasant) working environment.  That may include being more careful in communicating with people from different cultures (both in sending and in receiving messages).

Why we didn’t yet manage to do this here, I don’t know.

Grüße, Carsten

_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest