[rfc-i] draft-iab-xml2rfc-03, "2.32 <name>"

julian.reschke at gmx.de (Julian Reschke) Thu, 23 June 2016 06:40 UTC

From: julian.reschke at gmx.de (Julian Reschke)
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 08:40:52 +0200
Subject: [rfc-i] draft-iab-xml2rfc-03, "2.32 <name>"
In-Reply-To: <72b3e93e-ac97-ecc3-c17a-7bd2c63a754b@rfc-editor.org>
References: <03c5eca7-2cf5-b8ea-b179-399b15848ded@gmx.de> <49B921A8-4D48-4BBC-81F7-8BFA2BBA06F9@vpnc.org> <99c9b09b-9ba6-7ca0-2d66-46c693609023@gmx.de> <07102ECA-170D-46D7-A89A-0540F0C26677@vpnc.org> <72b3e93e-ac97-ecc3-c17a-7bd2c63a754b@rfc-editor.org>
Message-ID: <b3998dbf-7ff4-9a9d-ac37-a3b942b41e5d@gmx.de>

On 2016-06-22 20:21, Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor) wrote:
> ...
> It sounds like all the serious issues are dealt with at this point, and
> what's left is pretty minor or even simply a matter of personal
> preference. I'd like to see this draft posted with the last bits you
> worked on, Paul, and declare it stable enough for publication. We will
> update this, and all the other drafts, with implementation experience as
> we start the production work on the code.
>
> Fair enough?
> -Heather
> ...

- Publishing a new draft is good, the last one was months old.

- I absolutely do not think we're done; I will go through the feedback 
emails I sent in the past months and in doubt open tickets in the 
xml2rfc trac instance on tools.ietf.org for better tracking.

Best regards, Julian