IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] deprecating relref

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Fri, 09 April 2021 07:18 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B083C3A131C; Fri, 9 Apr 2021 00:18:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (body has been altered)" header.d=gmx.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l4QwIZsKYLS6; Fri, 9 Apr 2021 00:17:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E2113A131B; Fri, 9 Apr 2021 00:17:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3F9BF407D3; Fri, 9 Apr 2021 00:17:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF234F407D3 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Fri, 9 Apr 2021 00:17:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gmx.net
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2CLEIS1rpY9z for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Fri, 9 Apr 2021 00:17:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.15]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69809F407C6 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Fri, 9 Apr 2021 00:17:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1617952666; bh=qaFegvRZDdq+HoI01Z+Wh3eGPKJQNUqk1kcYhZmt0RA=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=WhIXgS2Idr2PI2Xx78hFOvh+ku6ngdMiKJ9WrBK50RGNGJQJ/yh98oStfkV2SDZPd v/j1AMouf8xLtkbaAtHiYsITSaxsZQny3l5Jk55osnKDsh8dZF8UOfKPtJ/n+PBkiv gzTiUUC273R762Wae/+3zuRe7Z4YQ4gpatT4dGgk=
X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
Received: from [192.168.178.20] ([91.61.48.181]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx004 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1M6Ue3-1lWf4N2FOT-006scf for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Fri, 09 Apr 2021 09:17:46 +0200
To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
References: <060157d4-68a0-9729-cf0e-9eaa38ce45d8@mozilla.com> <F9234029-134F-4423-8C6A-13A904236A98@tzi.org>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <253cc10d-d355-e641-90eb-8bc0c0455486@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2021 09:17:44 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <F9234029-134F-4423-8C6A-13A904236A98@tzi.org>
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:xFMSYoUDBoIZAAKQ4HzsOLXGg4VUaMsAgjTaXiYbVtVgDfdk3gC BHQo7dRjDxvdc3VpJhCbNPPkU+nfub78HJ3GuLIv3nE6PbJwvh9QIgC4AxK1vZw9jgeI2o3 WiEQ2v7lsQC4Q1wAfnj58AufzI24SrDV97puywu8ZL7GxG8smmeFXtN+Xz8Md4ZY54n8Awh YbKKvZCUyRTtA5Pg4uL6g==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:IwBKyY466CA=:qWrAZ23afS5Nc2bpsznfVq lztKMpISJlcVpmcy/2RcuCgvQtkV6hrem4oaEocUgM/FNfiSh8AExOshehDUldpB2FBkvkyDJ KpqHWiW2X14bQ5VpKi5FogZ7Q4kfVPyOmDuoL+QzjrC3wxLm52lPa6GZuTv53yJM6Zl8Ojgep 5aIq91hjcdWqKNquOBpQqjWgWEbS4AU4bZ9QGC1eRUQ9FS4rrpBw2QENfVYf4i3kcYZhdAPIH v1GO60qDfanGVwTP/it7Q0RCUAVKNgsFevTjpCNadNMS3/lyiOJyTgVIh4iINkcQxCqd5kOCI ymVjDNn3mH4Qz8S4SDVWKhvkuTkzpBacxXyhRHj3v1yXei3JTB3d5NrD0bPqpLGdWhrI/2Lfz X3PwHLaJwmPm+hdqnHEzU4w9Y3EDolhK7I+dQJX0q/of/L4LyqNoYnLczu4QhUwFQ5u+Qik4/ GOGl5lXilPzXCbmWRKbOPe+8WYB1A+wUkvVDbq1VwEKrScfSxQfN4eDGrLU5+yHFTx165aBo3 o34ZVlEsaPa9F2PcQSFlinRzAG2YHAJTLNyjZkbrgR6FaM3jgJEQCqYy7FCw3obP2505mwBDg tCZn14DGDKGp+kUYVRpiTJ/34YvT4XRWg1snutr58/8ZEqYVec0/xPOU/tAkipc7LrMQjxKo7 I+Jt+wTriRdwgE7RB2bRSvm+hMZvuTWVMTI8fjv5SrT7K1sxcc+30Aeu9YtflYpvXMoh9d4DU a78mRa6xd7R1JYuZGix0H+ovxa6VJHox12BdYcwGG3V7UNUpEB7eAG2ZkPP/XprrbZicg0PwB G/pkfYXu7TTMpdknY3IZEaEtCoGthI42Eu+CGyaO+pLFQcQesswmFzrENRSXLaZCNUOfL5Udj vh9kjtqnwF3lVBykbaDx6+L42c9CAHO7WBkuZJOBBcCjQHhEuf4Ez3VqBXaCyM5h6OpIXJCAh vph7KmqsdVK5LrA9Tk/FA0zTSlzOBJaYhv9xfaywzCva/Xj/4EU5cj4Aw80ct/yILk/p2+RtL CjTbd+P/8hIc8SmhhhNIy2plLS1ebHYxutsROOX3gP7HaIxtxNYxZSb7NTJSpshirxoOGgRxq u+9C27ehxKNIJYZg/Is0wYWis8T1pPQe3J5K3vbcCLv2Faa2fL3pp6Xsn6EHjweYbrbs9H7aL H0oNqLnH8LqYB6DE4F7n06cnjyQz6LzJ8CVPj/AShznx3OBZieMkj6ACJ+83Odo45Zh9bustL T8mpGj6z6B24HnDoj
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] deprecating relref
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

Am 09.04.2021 um 06:41 schrieb Carsten Bormann:
> On 9. Apr 2021, at 02:20, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@mozilla.com> wrote:
>>
>> Therefore our recommendation is to deprecate
>> relref in 7991bis
>
> +1
>
>> and likely add some or all of the relref attributes to
>> xref.
>
> De facto v3 already has those attributes, and I hope we can simply stick to those, specifically:
>
> section
> sectionFormat (of, comma, parens, bare)

Yes. These were proposed during the developmen of 7991 (and I believe at
some point in an unreleased draft), but later replaced by <relref>.

> Usage in published RFCs so far:
>
>   336 sectionFormat=“bare"
>   391 sectionFormat=“comma"
> 42726 sectionFormat=“of"
>     1 sectionFormat=“parens”
>
> The value for sectionFormat=“of” is inflated as this is the default value, I think I'm only seeing 2215 actual section references in total, so it should really be 1487.

Inserting the "sectionFormat" default when indeed no section is
referenced IMHO is a bug in the preptool.

> ...

Best regards, Julian
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email