IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] Epub format tools

Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com> Tue, 22 November 2016 16:22 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B07A71296B3 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 08:22:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.587
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.587 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mg19o-99aR_5 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 08:22:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10EEA1296AE for <rfc-interest-archive-eekabaiReiB1@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 08:22:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0463B8013B; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 08:22:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96C8DB8013B for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 08:22:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4O1x1MMZSl_Y for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 08:22:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x233.google.com (mail-wm0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::233]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FD98B8013A for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 08:22:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm0-x233.google.com with SMTP id t79so33524851wmt.0 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 08:22:32 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=DUyc5TenN1jiPkCYJ5EdrjB0ta4NfCcsZqQBSu6ZNt8=; b=z5l6PRJr0yHru4blzLgXSmtqHnoprb34hlPhBYUQKnaUG0oVeamiKtG2IujeNpQOgu kCflEeeO1iaUhX/Qxkc6xLY6YrhWLMg/TzGEy6vXZCKZWA8tK9GobEWTaJi+cC6B8a4r l+KeUXXLJDnZXYkNdT3hSGfPPnVy+IBtwSZ1JHQgn7mz/IzrCGjJCddUPmCoa4prsvJQ 8BrEVYsq2Ez+RSYqGuLClsQFMs0Fq1jwuh7TB2DpVhf2uKiZeijewL4wbyjf5XVD3R97 0fq3w8PCzGcuqPqe8N6USTPcvzUdcvL0un8DbeihrGkKXcWCkvx/KfhTGikyVdLIfCHq o9Mg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=DUyc5TenN1jiPkCYJ5EdrjB0ta4NfCcsZqQBSu6ZNt8=; b=C0AlPiC9utmIqkj2dQ1A0iHpm5tp0xyQsoNQq+BuXGwvtslTNk9RWxRsWZoJql1QWj lkSmjEWnr9oB1bECTMTfjz0aIZVDC+ITiWFLzSjNKcw/2IDtsTuLWR3QTHIlHwBvk9lx +SCp+T6Z8NEuvduNMHc6ZU57ufRRLQyCjY+6wN4Sh1Cc7Cr0MTeKsAG52vtY/lstcdC6 MBE9AC5U4sZIqX5V+/wD93RcoSg1jg9iythLkiOTxWQatmFHSJrqzUnjBRXIL+k//NzD 4Cl48+z5aKjjq9AQ1p+MiqkRcHCQA3F8hnG3f5fb73n1C46+MYRfgIXGSvyTrRFI+lSk HK3g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC03+gc2g0vr0BFN4vOt6EjHpDg+wx48lOMVwxnZDs+6P+qviC6RLaIax14l//oY3mG8tAyyyrjy+oSLRxw==
X-Received: by 10.28.198.67 with SMTP id w64mr3235630wmf.13.1479831750827; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 08:22:30 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.194.3.41 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 08:22:30 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <7B942896-8F81-4EC0-AB4D-A232FEA5ADC7@att.com>
References: <CAMm+LwiPYuvnYkGmxt51-osVwGzak6SVvsNrfNOUXMO8LFQ4dw@mail.gmail.com> <7B942896-8F81-4EC0-AB4D-A232FEA5ADC7@att.com>
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 11:22:30 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: c08Xr_P9boIyHGiKF6duMOOMBNE
Message-ID: <CAMm+LwgdqVtXQJNSrM1ovPTq5zi_NvddN=-b=WOvXh10fJoo7g@mail.gmail.com>
To: "HANSEN, TONY L" <tony@att.com>
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Epub format tools
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: "rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org" <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7604248961917137204=="
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-interest" <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

They seem to have already done all the work on deciding what HTML features
to use. And they have a well developed tool chain.

Why reinvent the wheel?

On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 10:48 AM, HANSEN, TONY L <tony@att.com> wrote:

> Download format definitely.
>
>
>
> I don’t see it as an upload format though.
>
>
>
>                 Tony Hansen
>
>
>
> *From: *rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org> on behalf of
> Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
> *Date: *Tuesday, November 22, 2016 at 10:10 AM
> *To: *"rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org" <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
> *Subject: *[rfc-i] Epub format tools
>
>
>
> The W3C has just absorbed the ebook publishing standards forum.
>
>
>
> Since what they are doing is maintaining a subset of HTML and a packaging
> format, wouldn't that be an appropriate basis for the upload format?
>

_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email