[rfc-i] Use of reference groups in document
julian.reschke at gmx.de (Julian Reschke) Mon, 25 April 2016 08:16 UTC
From: julian.reschke at gmx.de (Julian Reschke)
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 10:16:38 +0200
Subject: [rfc-i] Use of reference groups in document
In-Reply-To: <038b01d193ed$9c048850$d40d98f0$@augustcellars.com>
References: <038b01d193ed$9c048850$d40d98f0$@augustcellars.com>
Message-ID: <bea5d09f-f216-c6ba-1994-0e61711dbe32@gmx.de>
On 2016-04-11 14:28, Jim Schaad wrote: > I am starting to get a pair of drafts ready for updating and I came across > the following potential problem that should be thought about. > > RFC 5650 and 5651 both have informally defined reference groups done by > adding a text section to the references that defines some reference groups. Pointer, please? (I looked at 5650 but couldn't find what you're referring to) > It turns out that the same document appears in multiple groups. This is > going to be a generic problem since the IDREFs would be the same if one > builds the group in the normal manner. It might be that we need to modify > the IDREFs when building groups in some cases. IMHO <referencegroup> was designed with one specific use case in mind: <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7322#section-4.8.6.3>, and that indeed is different from your's. I think we have several problems in this area: 1) the one you just identified, 2) a general doubt that what the RFC Design Guide requires actually makes sense, 3) and also we haven't thought through how these actually get rendered; the instructions in <https://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-iab-html-rfc-02.html#element.referencegroup> would just generate an indented reference list, and not produce what RFC 7322 asks for (note the lack of the link to the RFC Editor info page). Best regards, Julian
- [rfc-i] Use of reference groups in document Jim Schaad
- [rfc-i] Use of reference groups in document Julian Reschke
- [rfc-i] Use of reference groups in document Jim Schaad