[rfc-i] Change in DOI format
"Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)" <rse@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 21 November 2016 22:33 UTC
Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8492A129470
for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Mon, 21 Nov 2016 14:33:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3,
RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id sOSpyW3sbBf9
for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Mon, 21 Nov 2016 14:33:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1485129482
for <rfc-interest-archive-eekabaiReiB1@ietf.org>;
Mon, 21 Nov 2016 14:32:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1])
by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD655B80110;
Mon, 21 Nov 2016 14:32:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A86FFB80110
for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 14:32:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id I3ZEkbnWl3Tl for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>;
Mon, 21 Nov 2016 14:32:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40])
by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74BC7B8010F
for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 14:32:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD3001E5692
for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 14:31:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id RgS9Kltuymtk for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>;
Mon, 21 Nov 2016 14:31:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Heathers-MacBook-Pro.local (c-50-159-75-65.hsd1.wa.comcast.net
[50.159.75.65]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 814001E568B
for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 14:31:26 -0800 (PST)
From: "Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)" <rse@rfc-editor.org>
To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Message-ID: <64226b03-095a-87f8-70ed-c2a8bbb6f12b@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 14:32:56 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0)
Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [rfc-i] Change in DOI format
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions."
<rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>,
<mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>,
<mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3393867679876282476=="
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-interest" <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
Hello all, You may notice a slight change to the format of our DOI information in our publication announcements, Info pages, and our index. The format of the DOI is in the process of being made consistent across our materials, including our citations, such that everything will look like: *DOI*: 10.17487/RFC#### (to use a specific example, " *DOI*: 10.17487/RFC7332") As a reminder, we participate in the DOI system via Crossref, our DOI registrar, to help support authors in the academic research community. Scholarly publishing in particular uses DOIs as a common industry practice that enables much easier citation and cross referencing to books, articles, and other material registered in the DOI system. Please let me know if you have any questions, Heather
_______________________________________________ rfc-interest mailing list rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest
- [rfc-i] Change in DOI format Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)
- Re: [rfc-i] Change in DOI format Carsten Bormann