[rfc-i] Unicode in ABNF, with UTF-8/16 draft-seantek-unicode-in-abnf-02.txt
Sean Leonard <dev+ietf@seantek.com> Sat, 05 November 2016 19:54 UTC
Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD3BB129406
for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Sat, 5 Nov 2016 12:54:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001,
SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id NCGDarqZ1Ly3
for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Sat, 5 Nov 2016 12:54:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF03B129443
for <rfc-interest-archive-eekabaiReiB1@ietf.org>;
Sat, 5 Nov 2016 12:54:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1])
by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14BFFB81F29;
Sat, 5 Nov 2016 12:54:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17C29B81F29
for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Sat, 5 Nov 2016 12:54:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id HsyYImHiYIYD for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>;
Sat, 5 Nov 2016 12:54:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net (mxout-07.mxes.net [216.86.168.182])
by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7F0BB81F28
for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Sat, 5 Nov 2016 12:54:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.123.7] (unknown [76.90.60.238])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CDAD322E1FA;
Sat, 5 Nov 2016 15:54:02 -0400 (EDT)
References: <147801436622.23912.4352060183413354096.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: "abnf-discuss@ietf.org" <abnf-discuss@ietf.org>
From: Sean Leonard <dev+ietf@seantek.com>
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <147801436622.23912.4352060183413354096.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Message-ID: <7b542b3d-606c-3607-b161-12dfe41a91bb@seantek.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2016 12:54:18 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <147801436622.23912.4352060183413354096.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Subject: [rfc-i] Unicode in ABNF,
with UTF-8/16 draft-seantek-unicode-in-abnf-02.txt
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions."
<rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>,
<mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>,
<mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: "rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org" <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-interest" <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
Dear ABNF-Discuss (and rfc-interest): This is an update to the Unicode in ABNF draft. The new addition in this draft is a transformation syntax to UTF-8 and UTF-16. Just got it in at the deadline, so it's still a bit rough but at least that's the idea. Regards, Sean ********** A new version of I-D, draft-seantek-unicode-in-abnf-02.txt has been successfully submitted by Sean Leonard and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-seantek-unicode-in-abnf Revision: 02 Title: Unicode in ABNF Document date: 2016-10-31 Group: Individual Submission Pages: 13 URL: https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-seantek-unicode-in-abnf-02.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-seantek-unicode-in-abnf/ Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-seantek-unicode-in-abnf-02 Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-seantek-unicode-in-abnf-02 Abstract: This experimental document adds support for Unicode strings in ABNF (Augmented Backus-Naur Form), and provides certain symbols related to Unicode code point ranges. _______________________________________________ rfc-interest mailing list rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest
- [rfc-i] Unicode in ABNF, with UTF-8/16 draft-sean… Sean Leonard