[rfc-i] draft-iab-xml2rfc-03, "B.2.1 Overlapping Values"

jhildebr at cisco.com (Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)) Tue, 15 March 2016 21:44 UTC

From: jhildebr at cisco.com (Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr))
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 21:44:58 +0000
Subject: [rfc-i] draft-iab-xml2rfc-03, "B.2.1 Overlapping Values"
In-Reply-To: <56E73341.8010604@gmx.de>
References: <56E73341.8010604@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <E14CDB2B-0AE2-4E26-B8D7-99EA3B14D774@cisco.com>

On 3/14/16, 3:55 PM, "rfc-interest on behalf of Julian Reschke" <rfc-interest-bounces at rfc-editor.org on behalf of julian.reschke at gmx.de> wrote:



><http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-iab-xml2rfc-03.html#rfc.section.B.2.1>:
>
>""pn" for all elements not listed above always has the format 
>"p-nnn-mmm", where "nnn" is the section number and "mmm" is the relative 
>position in the section. For example, this would be "p-2.1.3-7" for the 
>seventh part number in Section 2.1.3."
>
>I believe we need to enumerate which elements are numbered. For 
>instance, <iref> is not, right?

Correct.  The editor's version of the preptool draft currently says:

Add ?pn? attributes for all parts. Parts are:
* <section>: pn=?s-1.4.2?
* <references>: pn=?s-12? or pn=?s-12.1?
* <abstract>: pn=?s-abstract?
* <note>: pn=?s-note-2?
* <boilerplate>: pn=?s-boilerplate?
* <table>: pn=?t-3?
* <figure>: pn=?f-4?
* <artwork>, <aside>, <blockquote>, <dl>, <dt>, <li>, <ol>, <sourcecode>, <t>, <ul>: pn=?p-[section]-[counter]?

(which needs to be fixed for boilerplate still)


I'm not currently doing <dt>; should those start at one higher than their parent <dl>, or should we remove it from the list?

-- 
Joe Hildebrand