IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] 3rd party SDO cross-referencing of IETF work (was: Re: Chair/datatracker tracking expired WG documents ?)

"Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com> Wed, 30 March 2022 02:00 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25A423A1A2B for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Mar 2022 19:00:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1648605618; bh=g2KlLMCoFag9lSP+ooeFkj6vXQG4ma1hTwQ4cftznpo=; h=Date:To:References:From:In-Reply-To:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: Cc; b=vi0Rrd4a0su2HupgiKLf0dQ5vQZvhUkjVbfF3XZ6opS+1knBRKDI8UwndeX7vNQNH iOyAbPkepriNhWTjM6wKcG1knCvWM+cgIOOmY1NSQkS6jhYWbktS/F3xqN5rseITqW IqliuAeHPr7jntInOUB15AMyINULtNjzVfZLKzR4=
X-Mailbox-Line: From rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org Tue Mar 29 19:00:16 2022
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4EDD3A1A04; Tue, 29 Mar 2022 19:00:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1648605615; bh=g2KlLMCoFag9lSP+ooeFkj6vXQG4ma1hTwQ4cftznpo=; h=Date:To:References:From:In-Reply-To:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: Cc; b=IaClfDJ9PcmlYDfmmUZcJY2Jzw5KuROl9vTdf5+4cQtXB6leQpLNrvNt6hUHR1efA tg3M4//s9SKbtG+m1ZmTLqyrMc2usKTafygxgLrhSP78GIlh2LhqwYJXVIzMdN5jtt IR7GqAKGdl05f3Z6VVBzCWyD7wEKqpMD+a7R6Dfc=
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E6373A1A04 for <rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Mar 2022 19:00:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.108
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.108 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=joelhalpern.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GAQoF2ofrfL5 for <rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Mar 2022 19:00:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from maila1.tigertech.net (maila1.tigertech.net [208.80.4.151]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36EE23A1A02 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 29 Mar 2022 19:00:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from maila2.tigertech.net (maila2.tigertech.net [208.80.4.152]) by maila1.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4KSqPx6CCJz4TDBT for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 29 Mar 2022 19:00:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by maila2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4KSqPx4cRLz6GBSj; Tue, 29 Mar 2022 19:00:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=joelhalpern.com; s=2.tigertech; t=1648605605; bh=aNp/OpzurBZvuE9pOBC7hpeTsHFcOfSnbwOdfKSdk+Q=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=mnV4xF5OOuaZuJe+yW+ebNWjZ+whSwoAkTQK/wZXMsyQX1uZibtxpYm7Jj3NGQc3C ZCGEKMtWvFTClKftHYR6dHSzoo5yNLXbQliFW8yxuc/M+T50iF7i5X7lCBM7AJH1e+ h9wLRuAW4YFnp8iNAv81vQeJj8viHRJgSJCFojwU=
X-Quarantine-ID: <Yjk_Lcp9WYdf>
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at a2.tigertech.net
Received: from [192.168.21.218] (50-233-136-230-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.233.136.230]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by maila2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4KSqPw6Ppdz6G7kX; Tue, 29 Mar 2022 19:00:04 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <6d9da2e3-5760-3b1c-cf74-aa64d32df5e1@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2022 22:00:02 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.7.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
References: <Yj2d4DJMFWJOxoZa@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <317196df-3363-36c9-2421-02d9e229f664@joelhalpern.com> <CO1PR11MB488130CFF42A9F309AE1E212D81A9@CO1PR11MB4881.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <95b5dab0-3eb5-536d-85fc-d428f26364ed@joelhalpern.com> <CABcZeBOSMRffY6cXjwn7A6d=JWDJmmBrgHxiPD-XRMTMazOjLw@mail.gmail.com> <CO1PR11MB48812B0C5B88C190FB4A28ECD81D9@CO1PR11MB4881.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <7042bc99-5d14-993c-198b-1080b4ff5636@gmail.com> <CH0PR02MB8291A7A9598871412C035882D61E9@CH0PR02MB8291.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> <39A3A9C9-5EED-4E44-9695-6186C5A3F7AC@akamai.com>
From: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
In-Reply-To: <39A3A9C9-5EED-4E44-9695-6186C5A3F7AC@akamai.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfc-interest/r7LTHKmfcxrVNV6ju6UIWtto1RE>
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] 3rd party SDO cross-referencing of IETF work (was: Re: Chair/datatracker tracking expired WG documents ?)
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: "wgchairs@ietf.org" <wgchairs@ietf.org>, "rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org" <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-interest" <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

I fear I am missing something in the process.  Is there a procedure for 
community or IESG review of the text before it goes live?

Yours,
Joel

On 3/29/2022 5:47 PM, Salz, Rich wrote:
>>     These couple of sentences in the Tao are actually from RFC2026 and about the transient state of I-Ds.
> 
> In fact, the current version of the Tao (maintained at https://github.com/ietf/tao) doesn't have that language, but instead just points to BCP 9. Phrases like "work in progress" are also removed, pointing to BCP 9.
> 
> We only just finished editing/merging before IETF 113, and there wasn't time to update the website.  Please take a look at the GitHub repo and see if the language there needs to be fixed.
> 
> I think Valery's point got lost :(
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email