[rfc-i] sourcecode/@originalSrc
jhildebr at cisco.com (Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)) Tue, 16 February 2016 21:48 UTC
From: jhildebr at cisco.com (Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr))
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 21:48:55 +0000
Subject: [rfc-i] sourcecode/@originalSrc
In-Reply-To: <56C39628.1040101@alum.mit.edu>
References: <C85B2838-8433-4F79-8238-0BFD6D9D3DE8@att.com>
<56C39628.1040101@alum.mit.edu>
Message-ID: <7EF8B30D-7757-414E-9137-78FFEF857A0F@cisco.com>
On 2/16/16, 2:35 PM, "rfc-interest on behalf of Paul Kyzivat" <rfc-interest-bounces at rfc-editor.org on behalf of pkyzivat at alum.mit.edu> wrote: >On 2/16/16 2:28 PM, HANSEN, TONY L wrote: >> Wherever there's a src= element, there should be an originalSrc element to match. > >The originalSrc element itself might be a reason to keep src=. To be fair, x:include usually leaves behind xml:base moosetracks, but I don't find those semantic enough in this case. -- Joe Hildebrand
- [rfc-i] sourcecode/@originalSrc Joe Hildebrand jhildebr
- [rfc-i] sourcecode/@originalSrc HANSEN, TONY L
- [rfc-i] sourcecode/@originalSrc Paul Kyzivat
- [rfc-i] sourcecode/@originalSrc Joe Hildebrand jhildebr
- [rfc-i] sourcecode/@originalSrc Paul Hoffman