IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] draft-kuehlewind-update-tag/

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Fri, 27 March 2020 22:03 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A46C23A0C24 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 15:03:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.448
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.448 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rIsuc3LwKsEm for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 15:03:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86B673A0C20 for <rfc-interest-archive-SieQuei0be@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 15:03:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B8B3F40720; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 15:03:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B474EF40720 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 15:03:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P0LbdCqVUsPy for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 15:03:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x1033.google.com (mail-pj1-x1033.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1033]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E47A4F4071F for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 15:03:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x1033.google.com with SMTP id g9so4317919pjp.0 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 15:03:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0qjgU4Qdb5KrKQ7scQIqU84N8r0hI5RTjQkRocgFwg8=; b=HPlovsZl+roFR7UBogK5kMJnzBLk3rfswAHo+tKet9lY2gu+2mObHb9qWfxkOFPs2M qDpofSCEflOVumHFb+mxOVIVx775sO2/dEZziNHacQXCWl4LsgdZu2UvQNB0HE9dSEXE AYuZHnYUoDQR2nQxoYVnyFYOcvIuIHr2z5y+GIeD/egwbaUpiAsszb+kbmzsliWm21gf EuooOvGo/y+baNtHqaCU07ABZ7ZNKFmIyH9/cZpe7FfIr5qR/rTiR7scorEaMMlgeP0R o2vKjiwc7du46kvbcXwvS3na/S7wKBM+PqwSI0IgB8g4D6NX9AXs4WYDvXzX1l/jS8Uz yG9w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=0qjgU4Qdb5KrKQ7scQIqU84N8r0hI5RTjQkRocgFwg8=; b=Acb2AoADPSadJ3tb/vSxFp4GE5WT/WuUJdLr+nnc5+7IvTUYA+xPw+WCpyHE73Z5lV 371DhzO2nn8h0mitwkPZSlcxvpgZxQsSw2rlhxgeZHj/IHS+A1l+su0MHg3kjnHeEQ+2 gY8yaZy8DRnquI9taMqiZGLgN6fOZPrLE111K7NuQ5CNzWktUsOicf38qHyJAuQGamRN JgTLZdyZUjlvH1EPtKjjiLB8eQKnFhu+7kz1orq+Xw/rbs4v53kcAIpZaMCCVwWAAk2z Nu8DqgOqX2KABYNfzEEsrA7LUIotyXgCalM5Wh+RnIftuTK6ehZVWgN9yi5b9UxNruFr s5jg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ1lZERCXhhv0ZcadaNgyG8a9k3lgpwCD+CkkRDkGiRJbYlUrqFu E/fUTj9Ff4wiW9N5QWBq0g8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vu6vmc4rkbNlqbfyOtQ2MJbPOnuIEmY0+8L2kho9Xy7vzJSmT1Rxwq0u5iCixgGz/ccXU/8Gw==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:3349:: with SMTP id m67mr1543530pjb.175.1585346628338; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 15:03:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.30] ([165.84.25.143]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z12sm5097351pfj.144.2020.03.27.15.03.41 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 27 Mar 2020 15:03:44 -0700 (PDT)
To: Joseph Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
References: <CAM4esxQDdY6L7N5ieVkEfZuGwDdtUnptvuVN69Bu744jLc2-xg@mail.gmail.com> <MN2PR11MB4366823B2EE040B5C3A2FBA0B5CE0@MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <20200325232451.GR30574@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <9AA83737-63DF-4B4F-84FC-4BC6CAC7A50C@strayalpha.com> <20200325235405.GU30574@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <B8AC5A2C-4C65-4949-9C1A-C022E1479FEE@strayalpha.com> <6f5c3f41-4440-b594-a82e-9a403fe77fe3@nostrum.com> <CABcZeBO2vapFY9nE_RTbw83tkfWT4aSCFk-7WsH6ctPQGvznkw@mail.gmail.com> <4EF33202-72A8-4E27-85BD-AAA716292C1A@fugue.com> <CABcZeBM7y+HwRbdd5L4VtFbzootG=soShHD39b36w2bkM75HKQ@mail.gmail.com> <F15C68BA-6D74-4B6C-8C6A-7C6BBD849AF2@fugue.com> <CABcZeBP0JM0JKqMqFKX4ROoztA_jPQTun_MFe0D0TK9=3FtfXw@mail.gmail.com> <bc8a5cdb-a3f1-7505-2558-25cc417506cd@gmail.com> <29D2D27D-28FF-468D-9CC6-70829B571B02@strayalpha.com> <1e33c05d-9935-ff81-2fc4-69e76fd4f909@gmail.com> <1C71BE62-1D3E-4620-9B89-216FAFEEB8CF@strayalpha.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <12a72724-1a9b-f7fb-7357-d594c1fe385a@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2020 11:03:39 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1C71BE62-1D3E-4620-9B89-216FAFEEB8CF@strayalpha.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] draft-kuehlewind-update-tag/
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>, "rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org" <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

On 27-Mar-20 16:48, Joseph Touch wrote:
...
>>>
>>> Draft-tsvwg-udp-options - does what?
>>> 	- it extends UDP with options
>>> 	- but it also alters UDP to prohibit UDP length values that 786 allows
>>>
>>> Is that extends or emends?
>>
>> Both. Why would it be a problem to use both tags if they both apply?
> 
> What’s the point? Why the nuance?

Personally, I don't think that the difference between:
"You need to write some new code."
and
"You need go and fix your old code."
is just a nuance. Product managers may view these as two totally
different matters with different business implications.

    Brian  


_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email