[rfc-i] sourcecode/@originalSrc
jhildebr at cisco.com (Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)) Tue, 16 February 2016 18:50 UTC
From: jhildebr at cisco.com (Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr))
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 18:50:48 +0000
Subject: [rfc-i] sourcecode/@originalSrc
Message-ID: <D7803D73-A752-4EF4-AE29-A970D7F324F8@cisco.com>
<artwork> has an @originalSrc attribute to track where the source came from, after the @src attribute has been de-referenced and included (either as text inside the element or as a data: URI) by the preptool. Should <sourcecode> have the same thing? The @name attribute's semantics are different. -- Joe Hildebrand
- [rfc-i] sourcecode/@originalSrc Joe Hildebrand jhildebr
- [rfc-i] sourcecode/@originalSrc HANSEN, TONY L
- [rfc-i] sourcecode/@originalSrc Paul Kyzivat
- [rfc-i] sourcecode/@originalSrc Joe Hildebrand jhildebr
- [rfc-i] sourcecode/@originalSrc Paul Hoffman