Re: [rfc-i] Should RFC-7996-bis be an IETF document in an IETF WG?

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Tue, 28 January 2020 20:10 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FAACF406D8 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 12:10:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gmx.net
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nOg7CPnWGd50 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 12:10:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.20]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83CFFF406CB for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 12:10:23 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1580242224; bh=aOF3guPK4ZzXreSA90Aq2JvO4U4MmioyCq18XDUAwiA=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=I8fsWvFRQ78oYEUX0ye4mm+rWwE2aH41ejXTuO+d6xSqs0qdVspCdjE4TMd24w+gU j1WBzPdkqkqE+CCl7dvVlsXtqdISw6TR6E5nuPgW6Re7I1ZGacuoa3+CCN+xeI+pVU q1XLIGt9dPEb+T10vNQgVXH+zk5xslpX3SXQF9uI=
X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
Received: from [192.168.178.124] ([217.251.143.22]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx104 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1N2Dx8-1jiM0s2I74-013dlq; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 21:10:24 +0100
To: Doug Royer <douglasroyer@gmail.com>, "rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org" <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
References: <2ca97fdd-bd7d-3758-1be6-dacd6517c0af@gmail.com>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <264786fd-4096-31b8-5af2-ed6176f8db21@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2020 21:10:24 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <2ca97fdd-bd7d-3758-1be6-dacd6517c0af@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:kEn924w6IoLKcyYnNOnO/mwrREqaxYZPVS2jTO55AdOsELE+3+Y 5CYyaU/bo6m7GJ1KzDkXo4gBOFCSYQKD85RKUTZZdarWksP1Yq1AJg/Poq1lfZP2paIRSKH Au1nSFBOvFjJnh+h8slGxkKKhXXDuyWHEKhl5COcMJD2m0cuLu4PBoqcF6gcF0E945L8133 7ZeGrqzCOWkaYZqhKZg7A==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:V65+miGldA0=:JYkvKMbXcBYU+y5lEFPs1z h5C86pOy+I/IwgK8m/wQ8EJdDo3RGf51xxSMm6ZStHCt+la95EjM2sYur3Gjh0zgYfXzQRmv2 pnA0/gqv3ZRxnmMNtL475Mpyx5BqqAkEMIHjRnbpMLMkOsclvKRypJH2jzuGbM5QfTothDiMX vVxRqto4VahYRdDomWFf+VSccq+KyMLg07WG5rPOZnUQ7oFaIGkigoHVwJpp5YGiQ95PjoZ7k F3GhWGkHpLm3msyiA6PDld/2QZI4R2LACcrefvsBcigQEPtl3MyNhv9iOXgOCXE1k0HAaLiAh ZvaFv1U8old/JZ6aq+wPhj/tbeBpYyPnuoa/296PjUu1QDnpJyS6D4zAUpvTr0TYXwCNbScrT 3yHOlb+oGtqYgZCtDjDn583Adc9VLefT1uHQaTmog2EpeoejE1qS2W4ay5O1m5e6DbOdfbebM 6aDrugiXE/HEmImjqnoYO5BoeRS2xIRhkVOf4a89kXKTXF6zuZ7iglPpUeqW6uIxwhXfk/duf wOJHJk2fb9qFIuNuNeNA1N34sipPI/l1uhWXJ5pYyraGQUHSAJKL5zQrRx5A7pR9l4MG2ewer yxqlQshzOIvTOWyetJdOkKw+NH8eNM2ekHBwp+KnhJQ7c1ionsGCIdL/0MXdgqxTgFS61tsuV NZv9QA8IW0sYH6Um+8qvbfcnfckBHKihd7WGyBdljC+sXSKRkgIqFGYv2WqYq2Ubz+yKmLiRh /gEwDtkioSr/nYKVZGIro7izjBakcJoZJ+J1J/4xJS8/Wx43MiU0C0q6ICN4Ccm7r6lsX1a8b menN/nNj7vzX+ut8ohnkzVKbAtBm069FaRhiZ8rUF1Sf8UKVVIXDHwx5N4lNJvOATHpLE2ql/ aDH3KIReX9y9Q/cwj+ZymrQznBlEHmrly7Bge5uAGx5F4lfHJPZ3rb/bZF9ytN0rv2pph1/JR YtWZVDUlEhr0ZMSJLnCDj9dy8q1ex/GwseqC6MsIq4HeiYAawMWGms/J39QkTBUbmziKuxpXt RUxgKWd3mFsYNmg2uBEbVNKgVENlFKcOjAGHYU2EKHsdIvMhWSJLLTW2OZwo68uVCZdcwL751 LoLBk4j9IEIM0/+vwjts4lef346PYDW064z8POeC/zpmOrXl++3vxt2j4L+hxeqaGGbkPesGg 0EekF+Rl0Q99gZRKYnBWZ2S2jpViVExAZXmKkRHUVWw1FEt/hCe9EYcaT86/18VLPb+UmOZOf WLTBA7pthZ+qszAxQ
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Should RFC-7996-bis be an IETF document in an IETF WG?
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2020 20:10:25 -0000

On 28.01.2020 20:55, Doug Royer wrote:
> On 1/28/20 10:37 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
>
>> -> <https://github.com/rfc-format/draft-iab-svg-rfc-bis>
>
> As important as this is to IETF authors, should this be an IETF draft?
> In an IETF working group? The contents of SVG-RFC and how to make and
> edit drafts and RFC documents seems like a big deal that would be of
> interest to a broader audience.
>
> Unfortunately it will probably slow it down as that seems to be what
> happens. However this is the BIS version, so I would think a little more
> time to get it more right would be a great thing.
>
> I quick search of my ietf-announce list archive has no mention that
> 7996-bis exists. I searched for SVG and 7996. (My Thunderbird has over
> 4,000 of the last sent to the ietf-announce list).
>
> Maybe there is a good reason to do this work on non 'IETF' lists. If so,
> I would love to hear the reasons.
> ...

That's a question for the RSE, not me :-)

Best regards, Julian