IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] The RFC Format docs are now RFCs

Leif Johansson <leifj@mnt.se> Sun, 18 December 2016 13:59 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 335541294BA for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 05:59:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.191
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.191 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=mnt-se.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dj-Np3Nc7I8E for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 05:59:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C25F31294B8 for <rfc-interest-archive-eekabaiReiB1@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 05:59:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 620F3B82994; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 05:59:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FEB4B81A3F for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Sat, 17 Dec 2016 13:03:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnt-se.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LTi3Dq0tC_81 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Sat, 17 Dec 2016 13:03:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf0-x22f.google.com (mail-lf0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::22f]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0623B81A3B for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Sat, 17 Dec 2016 13:03:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id y21so30324392lfa.1 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Sat, 17 Dec 2016 13:03:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnt-se.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=MgwbH2fnm6+E2cCGQAWHkhY9AKdSzfiOaTwJamXrD9M=; b=vdF0EwKmdGSdOV84LaDI5qeiMU5OU0Xr2LcWy+RssA2vu8OWLKKxRVoqdAFjfSU3t7 fC2SKhI+kPtFdmV+z0z4eAQtEjPQoMfzU2lDJkAqI1uKZ7hHjxCxqxyhjsvdzv+Ye3Kw Rl6N3PtXo8HL+mAYwllQpG6w1tjTuWRXrwrW7jxSn7/hYW6sTiVqOXhz6svATpMpmWhZ O6mLpA+aLXQ08LCMS0Yv55yiiFiXC1LcYWPUXNamSLdSozW/cAggauhRGpkiTWxWbS+U U2uPbe5zraFepJLd7aGp19Rb94pQQbhWLtca28uU2afUxARKiO2Ex6OUbhSkN8bkqB99 mMYw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=MgwbH2fnm6+E2cCGQAWHkhY9AKdSzfiOaTwJamXrD9M=; b=QjYx/89nDDIRjvL00AJIoal3S9Doch66js/ItiblIBODcNF+Xo82aceZubjUHQHKuY j08rlNj79FMDJVB/516QFlEpvjb0Amt/PuYfzUADnYniJZ0Wc9X+MFzM2GPaDcYlepzF lSn+5guIYh3/7uS6rinU+F9C2lOP6GOyX7Zo7YSuie+xofB07YE/M1u2rNAzhJNHW/s6 UhZOCPJulyo2Wl18X6GBtp3YDFGP0SxFc0ZLJdIUQIiYGw0YAgsTDKD60DiEQq/EPPDR LIwsTvpfIb0BFNUWbBfgWmh0qHu3lhsAWCP4zcESmNNRr3Z/vt6CWRZotYYB/zvx1k6e Dl7g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC00Bo0aOP2mjv78XmhcYPFquQBCAwocYhIFMTC4ukBrvGWHsr7p191ytmpRdzpFU+g==
X-Received: by 10.25.0.194 with SMTP id 185mr2612328lfa.53.1482008605403; Sat, 17 Dec 2016 13:03:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.0.123] (tb62-102-145-131.cust.teknikbyran.com. [62.102.145.131]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o103sm2391560lfi.44.2016.12.17.13.03.24 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 17 Dec 2016 13:03:24 -0800 (PST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Leif Johansson <leifj@mnt.se>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (14B100)
In-Reply-To: <2530302c-cab3-09b1-6c2d-39c2bd84ecf6@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2016 22:03:22 +0100
Message-Id: <5F2020E5-46DC-4B8A-B1BA-C3D441565459@mnt.se>
References: <2530302c-cab3-09b1-6c2d-39c2bd84ecf6@rfc-editor.org>
To: "Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)" <rse@rfc-editor.org>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 18 Dec 2016 05:59:33 -0800
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] The RFC Format docs are now RFCs
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org, ietf@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

Congratulations!
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email