[rfc-i] ABNF Core Rule extensions

nico at cryptonector.com (Nico Williams) Fri, 30 January 2015 21:41 UTC

From: "nico at cryptonector.com"
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 15:41:29 -0600
Subject: [rfc-i] ABNF Core Rule extensions
In-Reply-To: <54CBEB88.4020608@dcrocker.net>
References: <54C3CF7F.6090901@seantek.com> <54C4AFF1.6030608@gmx.de> <54C7FAD7.7040500@alum.mit.edu> <54C870B5.7000205@seantek.com> <20150128173229.GC3110@localhost> <54C9632A.2040204@seantek.com> <20150128230227.GG3110@localhost> <54CB6B9A.1080801@seantek.com> <54CBB82F.2050007@alum.mit.edu> <54CBEB88.4020608@dcrocker.net>
Message-ID: <20150130214124.GN3110@localhost>

On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 12:37:28PM -0800, Dave Crocker wrote:
> On 1/30/2015 8:58 AM, Paul Kyzivat wrote:
> > OTOH, it might make sense to decouple the Core Rules from RFC5234 into
> > their own RFC. In that case it *might* make sense to do it here.
> 
> This might suggest defining basic ABNF to include a registry for
> enhancements.

That seems like overkill, unless there's pent up demand for lots of
extensions (which there might be, but I wouldn't know).

Nico
--