IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] New blog post on RFC v3 XML Issues

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Tue, 29 December 2020 15:06 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 546EB3A1425; Tue, 29 Dec 2020 07:06:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (body has been altered)" header.d=gmx.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sxGu6Womqhmi; Tue, 29 Dec 2020 07:06:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E600F3A1421; Tue, 29 Dec 2020 07:06:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BB64F4070E; Tue, 29 Dec 2020 07:05:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC440F4070E for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 29 Dec 2020 07:05:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gmx.net
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iyjX8LXORRo1 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 29 Dec 2020 07:05:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.18]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AEBDFF406F3 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 29 Dec 2020 07:05:43 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1609254366; bh=G0B9EFYdMvVjazFzJc/iKKmgM3TxRzOn7+niiOeX+Cw=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=MvDQE7eO3JvZxTJCkXn4LmALuLJ6v1TMkaGD5HjUcdhian3Vs2FLWelUccE4Lo54o 6GfyeWfIgR3KesSXBi+Gjaf/oxa/8Fmw7yaMK8zMCOL397ZCbKuFiiY0HEJDQhSyp9 wkfRru73M+OHd5LaM6VSlWieAFFTbU3QPTy3QYxI=
X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
Received: from [192.168.178.20] ([91.61.51.65]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx004 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MQMyZ-1kgjtP2tV3-00MN7g; Tue, 29 Dec 2020 16:06:06 +0100
To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
References: <7AAF25E8-F82A-46BA-BFDC-327DF38A0E46@ietf.org>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <5ae2e371-3b8f-6235-0303-b8f79e3c539e@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2020 16:06:04 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <7AAF25E8-F82A-46BA-BFDC-327DF38A0E46@ietf.org>
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:s42uuI/BteKcDb6Y9o+w144Njc44ScI7Qtd8Bv+lLlBnl6s1/lw vXSHL9zAzRJnLl9J9XRrNs3otWcJhBnNfSkManll0YfmQ98svW0M6/p/lvvfFlT4bqzQMcG Vqp7z7KPLBiSmdyO0ZYUN3FfEGbnYcrMQpMaMBHAWmXTi1HwJK4BF1TQbLv3UbefLqTn06v zyvtm11e38I53KgyNO0aQ==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:Twk9qZU4kbo=:ucUlMZYSKXNLRaviKsMK4p YSqtAXRii3aKWTv+D7Q6aPTjiXSLTXqjtizmJgsu5kZKMDX/vODKU/7E4Ni3YDAHCvWeiea0l 1tTox28T8NfiHU7mJjzohzDU/uX/73wrXYHlL7g2NFTtXqJNwHM0/YDsjMy0KkjBNYzccZ4vy fERXoFJpmKTSmRbcxVbZh5e6x+DWMqGiho6qGT5bbpqH21t/rZo/im0JMocjEOQGnlb8VG6qc pyum4YLdpvBo/O+WbomLsGcbMu26hXbvABUjZvmolWVejbjCLU2ZHWgfABPmGxhhDraKaHjYi R7beH6UH8Rf2fMi88RQYHa9BoN56Qt+8GeLukft6siMqXxaVcAkeQWy5FNZZhKvsb3L0NBWe0 zV/W/KgPRumwKv7bN14V3NYV45E+DZoU3AwI7MSRsWJ3A2XhVaX4/9UvHXTF9o/SSYgVj/0aH lzxLjjAMqK3Jm40XWdUY/7IQlE1jvr4Ddt81fEYy0xMPTldgMDXjkttijSLYdUkCU2MdhokVU dFp0gNwlLgWzKyr7GfxXfkeof/n6/EaxJYxzDFgrSBanZF8nMawupwTwrqbvGrbGULzlog4Iw HHoBTZlK4a2K+LWo2xoyriAVbKldGCZL5q4Tb9rJUwL15X+7D5B+uQefvXCuQAjTeDEvHAc4q g32V6xV9FnFCHl1PsFWioNwtze+q85EqDOWtqr258FxzYVmhVrAgcmh2Xt7THfFY7q9EAYR8H Lev7WYU9bYbHo0y8sGkeJp4J/Cn2YXBLuStjoWzBQn6REEmkZug4ZTfPGCjgxjL6BzXuKLKOp YftEdcDunD6vSID9R+kKHzdxEMx03gmns9Zo6X4NOZbvdiI3F2qPcXOc+gIy7n/WNlpnOMa5H J6W0/2jRV7LJihaH+4mvr5Oy9GQYNNhW5wjxakIso=
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] New blog post on RFC v3 XML Issues
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

Am 04.11.2020 um 22:50 schrieb Jay Daley:
> The Temporary RFC Series Project Manager (John Levine) produced a document on the RFC v3 XML Issues which I’ve put up as a blog post
>
> 	https://www.ietf.org/blog/rfc-v3-xml-issues/
>
> Jay
> ...

For the sake of accuracy... The blog says:

"The author of RFC 7991 and I are slowly updating 7991bis to document
the actual vocabulary that xml2rfc accepts and that RFCs use."

The author of RFC 7991 is Paul Hoffman, and he did not participate since
autumn 2019.

I myself (author auf RFC 7749, not 7991) did participate for a few
months this year, but I have been mostly inactive since early summer as
I didn't get the impression that we were actually getting where I think
we should be going.

(In the meantime the last draft dated March has expired)

Best regards, Julian

_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email