IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] Problem with Kramdown tooling and figures?

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Wed, 08 June 2022 13:40 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47934C15D87F for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Jun 2022 06:40:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1654695632; bh=4SnpK8R1vzjcNJIeRfKmTHhmKQu88pX281vNZmu2+NQ=; h=From:In-Reply-To:Date:References:To:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: Cc; b=l9cCERvnbR5NZU0MnLh2v0fpEpzw2qO6Dg1KViGSpYHTERUBRip2e9Ub5lv6CiCJq os2WQ1CrrQJ/H7WJKnsg5zVbk05O+Khh5+1oliq/sS9cjYoBXpj9evfyPYMWkG4zan Zjvqw2nt+P01kHppK2OyMyaQ9VbR4QzArIUwVISo=
X-Mailbox-Line: From rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org Wed Jun 8 06:40:32 2022
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22A0FC157B5B; Wed, 8 Jun 2022 06:40:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1654695632; bh=4SnpK8R1vzjcNJIeRfKmTHhmKQu88pX281vNZmu2+NQ=; h=From:In-Reply-To:Date:References:To:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: Cc; b=l9cCERvnbR5NZU0MnLh2v0fpEpzw2qO6Dg1KViGSpYHTERUBRip2e9Ub5lv6CiCJq os2WQ1CrrQJ/H7WJKnsg5zVbk05O+Khh5+1oliq/sS9cjYoBXpj9evfyPYMWkG4zan Zjvqw2nt+P01kHppK2OyMyaQ9VbR4QzArIUwVISo=
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DA4CC157B4F for <rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Jun 2022 06:40:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lbd2JWxc51YN for <rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Jun 2022 06:40:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.15]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5843EC14F72D for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 8 Jun 2022 06:40:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.118] (p5089ad4f.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.137.173.79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4LJ7dS3KtFzDCcB; Wed, 8 Jun 2022 15:40:12 +0200 (CEST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <99D6215E-50DA-422C-96D1-50949951394D@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2022 15:40:12 +0200
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 676388412.103213-e7ec4970b2d1f01e6a12157c434ab3e0
Message-Id: <CFDA15E7-17E0-435E-AA14-3D74D31C637E@tzi.org>
References: <MN2PR11MB37570F4603464349B5DFFE5AB9A59@MN2PR11MB3757.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <5E5D4003-E3D8-49B2-B14D-5D4AC7ADA0A3@tzi.org> <MN2PR11MB3757F2B3467FA1B188A1294DB9A49@MN2PR11MB3757.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <7FFFF173-7D5F-4000-BDD1-9B407767C48E@ietf.org> <MN2PR11MB375776E0FFAA1023CFE4334AB9A49@MN2PR11MB3757.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <99D6215E-50DA-422C-96D1-50949951394D@ietf.org>
To: Jay Daley <exec-director@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfc-interest/w3uK6eha6pEtBkyosQ3v-w8Pg_I>
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Problem with Kramdown tooling and figures?
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: "rfc-markdown@ietf.org" <rfc-markdown@ietf.org>, RFC Interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

On 2022-06-08, at 15:24, Jay Daley <exec-director@ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> From Carsten’s response it looks as if this is an issue with upstream kramdown so the following is for info only.

There is one issue with upstream kramdown; this has a workaround; it also seems quite fixable.
There are two issues with kramdown-rfc, one is fixed and will be pushed soon, the other requires some more thinking on the implementation level but is fundamentally fixable.

Grüße, Carsten

_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email