IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] Try this: was Re: New proposal/New SOW comment period

"Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com> Tue, 10 September 2019 15:34 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2A3D1208B0 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 08:34:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.995
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.995 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id di21R-zu5MZK for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 08:34:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB635120232 for <rfc-interest-archive-eekabaiReiB1@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 08:34:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 549C1B80B55; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 08:34:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B8ADB80B55 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 08:34:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CMOqBuqp9fTN for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 08:34:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x82a.google.com (mail-qt1-x82a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82a]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47060B80B53 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 08:34:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x82a.google.com with SMTP id r15so21201090qtn.12 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 08:34:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=SKt5U9vXFC4dRjXgifMiRh8E2mh3PNDi6SatJ9GNXbc=; b=TtFBS4Pd6CKrl/Ssre1oywRICA3zDP6V45lNHizZD2jktYU+dzrdUhBcJaVExbrJBu 8gq9IH1nPKGnpjuE0hJ9mr+pnZqZ9717R8aM6JlBUSOsLfBxoCZqPkqRORhaHLN8Cgpl IslCmCbDYse4iMQWR1bOuVP7ruW66pVS2i6a49g3q0e2DcEORtgANSrrTBG06X6/5WQ2 GdveUo+mAtNqe4BfmZ8o6prjTGL1xesLfhTD4SYP8/aWid8oRCe+OOIzi4PHnC/BWfbG NoSjtmSwlChCkoIZAo7DOY5Op+NXLJueSokzi3BngnRojhJ8OlYLyRTqXjLbCYBrM5uc UzEw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=SKt5U9vXFC4dRjXgifMiRh8E2mh3PNDi6SatJ9GNXbc=; b=OaM/gd9BRTEfqhb73P7to96LqcsZ8ESPGzP7mdf7p1OP3LeT0OcmS2zpG4rTUj6sIZ xRJ5hSRbRFLVM11MfAiYUxn9fy7+YxU0xOk5vG2sumH5D0SWBGQRgot16w86adFetlpQ isRX5dBWCCS35XzAsba3/AbqrMkf7MuIFD8PKY4u9lMpMFiEazkQKcrI9vKhFc0yFcTS fbG92uFZfBodAC+W82GrRBdwBZlNDgs5Ox38n1QscfmC7/hlpoIjTQcDZ/9A5TRAMW8m Jas3QaTVfLAAxTVlCLmYQd5MyCyIQQLVdtB4dor1yqieSFwtcS5EG1zxYB+d0KoIzYrP uWNw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXfvIvbNh3LoJ7TKgiy5Rqv7gWZcTbFXOujoEk00PMEkUP49e+w 2j9BYlEP4aCUk35gwXabADAaXTIPMTwTucDUbZg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzMtmxwrO/NBVbbgd0Ae+MFUuSU0eR+dLe+BWAnsCs77ilZ+k7amx+W+p1kO5cJAXUaPvz5zprvAUctDkdpztU=
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:4814:: with SMTP id g20mr29441977qtq.382.1568129662101; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 08:34:22 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <ec715385-93ca-ddf0-f9b1-d0e4ae1666fe@nthpermutation.com> <f3edd70c403583ab560888be39001d14.squirrel@www.amsl.com> <09bb6e35-bafa-90d9-fe35-e2feb21e6564@nthpermutation.com> <85f156b5-ad48-520d-a416-6c838b6d6174@gmail.com> <F98BE7A6-6EB7-472D-9E3C-D64CE203C8E5@civil-tongue.net>
In-Reply-To: <F98BE7A6-6EB7-472D-9E3C-D64CE203C8E5@civil-tongue.net>
From: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 11:34:11 -0400
Message-ID: <CAA=duU0vg4SQ_ccK528ZSksrgreM7ru4XHnOHJYV1FB0xWm0yg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Lucy Lynch <llynch@civil-tongue.net>
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Try this: was Re: New proposal/New SOW comment period
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: RFC Interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>, IETF Discuss List <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4496776116270270932=="
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

I also agree - just some editorial suggestions. As the reader may not be
completely familiar with the RFC series or RFC Editor role, an early
reference to rfc-editor.org would be helpful. In addition, all document
references, especially RFC references, should be hyperlinks.

Cheers,
Andy


On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 9:47 AM Lucy Lynch <llynch@civil-tongue.net> wrote:

>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Sep 9, 2019, at 7:11 PM, Brian E Carpenter <
> brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > With that fix, Mike's draft looks pretty good to me.
> >
>
> I agree - this is much closer to what I’d expect to see if I was looking
> at this job as a potential candidate
>
>
> > Regards
> >   Brian
> >
> >> On 09-Sep-19 06:57, Michael StJohns wrote:
> >>> On 9/8/2019 2:25 PM, RFC ISE (Adrian Farrel) wrote:
> >>> Hi Mike,
> >>>
> >>> With my ISE hat on...
> >>>
> >>>> I also added an "optional deliverable" to cover April fool's RFCs.
> >>> While the ISE in some sense sits under the RSE, I believe that the 4/1
> >>> RFCs are the responsibility of the ISE, not the RSE.
> >>>
> >>> Operationally, the ISE has always asked the for an opinion on candidate
> >>> documents, but the final decision has been with the ISE.
> >>>
> >>> I don't think you need to include this in the SoW.
> >>>
> >>> Best,
> >>> Adrian
> >>
> >> OOPS!   Noted and easy enough to remove.
> >>
> >> Let's see where/if this goes first...
> >>
> >> Mike
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> rfc-interest mailing list
> >> rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
> >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rfc-interest mailing list
> > rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
> > https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> rfc-interest mailing list
> rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest
>

_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email