[rfc-i] [IAB] draft-iab-html-rfc-02, "9.6 <aside>"
jhildebr at cisco.com (Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)) Tue, 01 March 2016 18:37 UTC
From: jhildebr at cisco.com (Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr))
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 18:37:56 +0000
Subject: [rfc-i] [IAB] draft-iab-html-rfc-02, "9.6 <aside>"
In-Reply-To: <56D2A15F.1020304@gmx.de>
References: <56D2A15F.1020304@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <A5A31224-F62B-4439-9542-0C48D5570B52@cisco.com>
On 2/28/16, 12:27 AM, "IAB on behalf of Julian Reschke" <iab-bounces at iab.org on behalf of julian.reschke at gmx.de> wrote: ><http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-iab-html-rfc-02.html#rfc.section.9.6>: > >> 9.6 <aside>send feedback >> >> This element is rendered as an HTML <aside> element, with all child content appropriately transformed and a pilcrow (Section 5.2) added. >> >> <aside id="p-1.2-6">A little more than kin, and less than kind. >> <a href="#p-1.2-6" class="pilcrow">¶</a> >> </aside> > >This seems to be inconsistent with the actual content model of <aside>, >which, for instance, could contain two paragraphs (two <t> elements). > >In particular, what XML source would produce the example text? I agree that this example is wrong. The <aside> should have a <p> in it at the very least. I'll also remove the pilcrow, since an <aside> is a lot more like a <section> than a <t>, and all of the children of the <aside> will have pilcrows. -- Joe Hildebrand
- [rfc-i] draft-iab-html-rfc-02, "9.6 <aside>" Julian Reschke
- [rfc-i] [IAB] draft-iab-html-rfc-02, "9.6 <aside>" Joe Hildebrand jhildebr