Re: [rfc-i] [Rsoc] New proposal/New SOW comment period

Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net> Sat, 31 August 2019 16:07 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C8BA1200D7 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 31 Aug 2019 09:07:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.952
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.952 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bi_LoWJdOcX7 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 31 Aug 2019 09:07:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4A4612004F for <rfc-interest-archive-eekabaiReiB1@ietf.org>; Sat, 31 Aug 2019 09:07:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66033B8127B; Sat, 31 Aug 2019 09:06:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20F31B8127C for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Sat, 31 Aug 2019 09:06:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gYb86ZiYQtmD for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Sat, 31 Aug 2019 09:06:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx43-out1.antispamcloud.com (mx43-out1.antispamcloud.com [138.201.61.189]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0FE7B8127A for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Sat, 31 Aug 2019 09:06:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xse258.mail2web.com ([66.113.197.4] helo=xse.mail2web.com) by mx120.antispamcloud.com with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <huitema@huitema.net>) id 1i45tw-000b9O-E3 for rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org; Sat, 31 Aug 2019 18:06:57 +0200
Received: from xsmtp21.mail2web.com (unknown [10.100.68.60]) by xse.mail2web.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46LLnm2Hysz1yKg for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Sat, 31 Aug 2019 09:06:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.5.2.13] (helo=xmail03.myhosting.com) by xsmtp21.mail2web.com with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <huitema@huitema.net>) id 1i45ts-0004Wq-6a for rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org; Sat, 31 Aug 2019 09:06:52 -0700
Received: (qmail 9303 invoked from network); 31 Aug 2019 16:06:51 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO [192.168.1.104]) (Authenticated-user:_huitema@huitema.net@[172.58.46.209]) (envelope-sender <huitema@huitema.net>) by xmail03.myhosting.com (qmail-ldap-1.03) with ESMTPA for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; 31 Aug 2019 16:06:51 -0000
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (16G77)
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20190831082218.0ba64748@elandnews.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2019 09:06:50 -0700
Message-Id: <FD1BA644-68A7-45E9-BAC7-16FB75F7D1FD@huitema.net>
References: <4675DA5C-0CFE-4E02-980D-770B17907D35@encrypted.net> <6.2.5.6.2.20190830124138.08d4ab38@elandnews.com> <5dd85c7b-84d4-9192-db70-28e61ed3bf01@nostrum.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20190830214019.0ba94918@elandnews.com> <740F4638-B988-4FB3-97EE-8EAEF366D521@akamai.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20190831082218.0ba64748@elandnews.com>
To: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
X-Originating-IP: 66.113.197.4
X-Spampanel-Domain: xsmtpout.mail2web.com
X-Spampanel-Username: 66.113.197.0/24
Authentication-Results: antispamcloud.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=66.113.197.0/24@xsmtpout.mail2web.com
X-Spampanel-Outgoing-Class: unsure
X-Spampanel-Outgoing-Evidence: Combined (0.15)
X-Recommended-Action: accept
X-Filter-ID: Mvzo4OR0dZXEDF/gcnlw0dHacFem4oEMoSF0RS12R++pSDasLI4SayDByyq9LIhVUZbR67CQ7/vm /hHDJU4RXkTNWdUk1Ol2OGx3IfrIJKywOmJyM1qr8uRnWBrbSAGDatr2qjVEYpI48T/8HRZsoW43 XeAVbFadXxNsR+jIm+4BcORxfCojcTOpEjtvWHp2qFjxxGC9s+XT+mB42NhxTTg9YkzbMy6DOYhG 3MUcvhrxNrJjiSXeBtvVVpEJHS+d/2ED+YSA+ZSpluooDFpe+5nckpWaLvahyBjmQxBKOztp0ugt Zlkw9p/AQdIE0knw7cPlLc4mPp21O6mudLBF4/IRL+spW60mrWiAEnQcn/qslg3CoCHsPz6pr/Ao kdAPhX8u3xIOOtB59sWJ1mr0rcswIlm249d1OOo21hSM9tXB1/2M1shZO++tsIV90EPuboZD5vPF e84pJQGk5dfbFPdfcXgLzsY3kBHC+ZTZl3RnfVPTqI4dkGNDDD1o0bE1YTJl/Vbyro+qbGZaEKoG AcB9K/tfe8pLmJg0fcGy9gwRLqjTJeBPrTCjLL/wN7uMRUcRfS0hzbGRZdtpa0UZ/x9JJ5TIDkE1 afsdX6NhD5uJR5QerAj+ilxozLphc2wliq9L99bdkAb+WcehT5lKdKxsEUw+8TKlh65C2tAGu5UH mFDqewO9xyOqCYO8P1aHChSMTZbMtliaYpebNO5BA8gcN4/2gcY8aGcjKnyC/4yau8ag6Ik44xqT UtVxl21yf0pst6G3y1tOP7bBTI4SKQM7as6wreE2f8C7bo2P7aVU5OG1GFGZ9raKe4wzneAhJrDD bBSqP4H9J8PTO4FCjzwJWw42swm4bO6gacpMpzLuch8dliO8ttG1V7rLoEwEBVvGnspKX1Qy0jAr 55TqIdn2uWfCTMr7dqLRWHiVeRBJeOaBZ3QGltM4cLXJcDSyE4kswb7YzKhySm3KCdywFmvDK3PK rieG7T6bf9hS7hQx0S1sh0LPt0VUPewpiDOvFiQeKRnvGKxB4wV2/L1ZF2Hf4ys44rg2B8/9FmK9 a1Nwex3yoyNXmDWGgOLq9vyL
X-Report-Abuse-To: spam@quarantine9.antispamcloud.com
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] [Rsoc] New proposal/New SOW comment period
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org, rsoc@iab.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

 

> On Aug 31, 2019, at 8:28 AM, S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Rich,
> At 07:50 AM 31-08-2019, Salz, Rich wrote:
>> I tend to agree.  Does short-term and longer-term make more sense?
> 
> The duration of the contract is described under "contract period".  It is also stated that this is a temporary position.  A person would likely read as that as not for a longer term, i.e short term.

The intent behind the tactical word or  the proposed short term replacement is to qualify the impact of the work, not its timing. The contractor will drive matters that have short term effect, but will not be making decisions about the long term evolution of the RFC series.

-- Christian Huitema
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest