[rfc-i] ABNF Core Rule extensions

julian.reschke at gmx.de (Julian Reschke) Sat, 31 January 2015 09:47 UTC

From: "julian.reschke at gmx.de"
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2015 10:47:28 +0100
Subject: [rfc-i] ABNF Core Rule extensions
In-Reply-To: <1v7pcatvrhpicaikakhifutocl2nfc2eoq@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>
References: <54C3CF7F.6090901@seantek.com> <54C4AFF1.6030608@gmx.de> <54C7FAD7.7040500@alum.mit.edu> <54C870B5.7000205@seantek.com> <20150128173229.GC3110@localhost> <54C9632A.2040204@seantek.com> <20150128230227.GG3110@localhost> <54CB6B9A.1080801@seantek.com> <54CBB82F.2050007@alum.mit.edu> <54CBEB88.4020608@dcrocker.net> <20150130214124.GN3110@localhost> <54CC1074.3060306@dcrocker.net> <54CC93FA.2030806@gmx.de> <1v7pcatvrhpicaikakhifutocl2nfc2eoq@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>
Message-ID: <54CCA4B0.4060506@gmx.de>

On 2015-01-31 10:30, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
> * Julian Reschke wrote:
>> On 2015-01-31 00:15, Dave Crocker wrote:
>>> [*] Case-Sensitive String Support in ABNF
>>>       https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7405
>>
>> Wow. A non-WG document updating a full standard where the discussion
>> that led to the draft apparently is not archived. Not good.
>
> It was discussed on https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abnf-discuss
> but as Barry Leiba pointed out there have been problems with archival,
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/abnf-discuss/OsWglgIDEE3DXW2eHvZmmvQ1-04

Yes. It would be cool is someone who has got the email could make them 
available somewhere.

Best regards, Julian