[rfc-i] draft-iab-xml2rfc-02 and draft-flanagan-nonascii feedback: Internationalization Considerations and 7760

bclaise at cisco.com (Benoit Claise) Thu, 24 March 2016 17:04 UTC

From: bclaise at cisco.com (Benoit Claise)
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 18:04:30 +0100
Subject: [rfc-i] draft-iab-xml2rfc-02 and draft-flanagan-nonascii feedback: Internationalization Considerations and 7760
In-Reply-To: <FA4497A4-12F3-4172-A456-4D528620226E@cisco.com>
References: <56A9F27D.1080301@cisco.com> <37C06524-A6E5-4DFD-9A59-DABE43BAC336@vpnc.org> <56F414AC.6000703@cisco.com> <FA4497A4-12F3-4172-A456-4D528620226E@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <56F41E1E.9030900@cisco.com>

On 3/24/2016 5:39 PM, Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr) wrote:
> Full names aren't unique either.  People also change their names over time.  How much do we care about the stats being perfect?
>
> If possible, I'd like to build the system we've spec'd out here, then after we have a little implementation experience, starting with requirements for the next version.  One of the things we could begin discussing is creating accounts for authors, giving each account a unique ID (such as a UUID), having the submission tool check the email addresses that are used by the author, ensuring that each author has a valid account, then injecting the UUIDs into the document in the preptool step.
>
> When we do that, I expect vocal community outcry about how we're tracking them and putting up hurdles to document submission, and whether those downsides are worth some small improvements in our statistics.
>
> I don't want that (long) conversation to keep us from shipping this version.
I was asked to provide my feedback, and you received it.
Do whatever you want with this is my next piece of feedback.

Regards, Benoit
>