Re: [Rfc-markdown] [xml2rfc-dev] [xml2rfc] New xml2rfc release: v2.25.0

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Fri, 30 August 2019 10:03 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: rfc-markdown@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfc-markdown@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AB671200FF; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 03:03:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gmx.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X4d6rlnD7HbL; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 03:03:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EC7012004F; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 03:03:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1567159370; bh=vHr+LSM65+4r4RYoAxhvuASN6HP2Rpq5NYh8FUp5x/w=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=LuiDSPq2C9YARTxrsAbBkbzDusA89QXcmod6HHDn1bbsIZtIFJ4WFGE63J65CXZSn urO/L86uqaYEbQXNPiO0p0YJ4X9K1up5bBpKbx6SQ+7oWhwOXqYuf2UTPg+Coj/yqk YYLFD/VBBxZ4HI/RMVm7QDN4qqHnoshkitE/NgJk=
X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
Received: from [192.168.1.34] ([217.91.35.233]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M08eS-1iJwAe3PhM-00uJrl; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 12:02:50 +0200
To: Robert Moskowitz <rgm@htt-consult.com>, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Cc: rfc-markdown@ietf.org, xml2rfc@ietf.org, XML Developer List <xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org>
References: <E1i2EMD-0002SA-UW@durif.tools.ietf.org> <d82ab9f2-5913-ad0e-dc05-2be319480a3c@htt-consult.com> <e206317e-bb51-c9e6-9dc2-c9d86b13b9da@levkowetz.com> <8fdc91d2-a683-eb4d-04f1-ade8e424436f@htt-consult.com> <3646d280-9e8c-9b90-093d-9dd36967fc7a@gmx.de> <59EADF98-C4C3-4F82-9534-AB706199CB4F@tzi.org> <8be273dd-6692-99d2-9162-20a7a3515605@gmx.de> <493d4dc2-ae06-e7da-3ca2-810ab889c7e1@htt-consult.com>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <3719c563-05a1-ec26-0375-bea2d45848c4@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2019 12:02:45 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <493d4dc2-ae06-e7da-3ca2-810ab889c7e1@htt-consult.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:x5g1+L2EbKZexBLF+McCmH3FUlOgLBYLE7D9owu62w04iKVux3f 3P6I/Gz8hdpO4pkQ8/Bld+L6ZhPxly96X20LwG8mXnmWAYVslzUR3dOW87sLlsNGheBNFRD 7Ec60zEpkBX0PSTapVeVAdpkQrMsoEJBUekR8qYIo8M82D0ZwXV4kuByYuBrKWRf1OpMcwC zRz6Jcvpcadgdoj50pvJA==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:RrPXgULiDRU=:AQe7ZqoF3y+BmMqq3ksfxp slfsHqF+xPx5oE2zMbmnuw8I75kOZtoDpJlowrn0riQSFCIl5LXzHWWiFFvw9gbywNkRf9Fh6 JOtqdxNzAgf5joXQzBay01FdNkqfeYwnzuH7Fwf/8sogK4JWD0RPuB3lntdribXvOdHCxF8uP OP0vqeJVaWeLXwduc2kutjXdyI/PbfEEhXPtj/6juMoe0N3MHyhV/XMK5KrR0ZhzIbmWRhi8z ZPHva9dGHNiWegPniAhzL+EJjhGzYesHFo2ZwGXyoTIXu01t4A9zmzhv2/1mkyda4Fv2SJlGN QNu4BJQ4QDNRxZreRsNud6h+42WzRVf1RE05K8i25dFiFNka3c25LYxZjiJpu74MSWmCVYGVO JkqCgxth441S930rr+cTUPBZ0f/y/zNpKfGzaTetw/F6CWKukt9IUsr4ytWSfqp6BgbtL+K9f SEty7K3ifhNHFOP6fk/oB9xdmQoSU+wPRDtBKLmddUz9ab0Fq6QmqoqhKhpvb8wYaNep2QTiw poXYQsYsvgsfJyWjVWzXaMAsm/41X0b/P3+T5IlIxQFPvFI5I3gfHspP3+5cGgGxPF2Tpo3AX Kae4EZMVdUFTnClhe//HF8LnMGAScLCpp5kjfadiclw1DhVV0bxAH1YfOCovlnEUopnvP4u9V qDk78HR3QOcFoGUsgpeGVH+krdEkQuTaKYqCp86dCqfdF3IiJO4n+AoI3xLF8zY0X6EvBEX7M CzZXHmmU+LN3oYRWcDNq6ovzMLOdapYc5DMnWycWsmRKQ7b1VKHMr1oAAhlgOeog8BDzq+wgJ Z54Gh42IEhL9e+0PJrMif/Q3ZSlOTeDsS086GYseagTUj2Uc6JWcq+AAiWu+qoLjDuek42vrs h4AKV45yHOliwFwswLwwr6fTxsvxw7eIcG9GvjHzuyaKmBXzp8hj2ryToOf2FZ5xOcTOq8cwF SMXk6bSjp70wkKucfUhTZBcVPrc0jm6tPzYCayVtRXlnu15EpOJqmV0I1uljoDvSfiI3o06v2 HIX0+SKkLWXzYQsCWpjW1oWMGCTWNo4+a1HsCBM8sAiCVka1zKk97iLGn+bPHrEj42QURnZK8 CVaa/I/r12AUlOwadGRY7NRdQcyAYfko6WAqoPs5Jx4RWNfF7RK82W11QcHOEKVrg3eBdIOr9 2VeXrHgA4MW5nrLgfVtbFdb8s3kr0WfT9rpwTg1gsmHB4b8w==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfc-markdown/Hquh0HqVqTXda8KF9AVomrth4SM>
Subject: Re: [Rfc-markdown] [xml2rfc-dev] [xml2rfc] New xml2rfc release: v2.25.0
X-BeenThere: rfc-markdown@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "rfc-markdown is a discussion list for people writing I-Ds and RFCs in Markdown and the authors of the tools used for that." <rfc-markdown.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rfc-markdown>, <mailto:rfc-markdown-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfc-markdown/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-markdown@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-markdown-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-markdown>, <mailto:rfc-markdown-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:03:13 -0000

On 30.08.2019 11:51, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
>
> On 8/30/19 12:53 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
>> On 30.08.2019 06:43, Carsten Bormann wrote:
>>> On Aug 30, 2019, at 06:21, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I need to find where 'consensus' is explained.
>>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> <https://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc7991.html#element.rfc.attribute.consensus>
>>>>
>>>
>>> I’m not sure whether you are serious when you say the attribute is
>>> “explained” there.
>>> Yes, there is text about this attribute.
>>> No, it is not explained.
>>> The reference to 7841 just points to more text about “consensus”
>>> there, but not about the meaning of this attribute.
>>
>> There's more text at
>> <https://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc7991.html#attribute-consensus>;
>> and the main definition should reference that:
>>
>>> A.3. The "consensus" Attribute
>>>
>>> For some of the publication streams (see Appendix A.2), the "Status
>>> of This Memo" section depends on whether there was a consensus to
>>> publish (again, see Section 3.4 of [RFC7841]).
>>>
>>> The consensus attribute can be used to supply this information. The
>>> acceptable values are "true" (the default) and "false"; "yes" and
>>> "no" from v2 are deprecated.
>>>
>>> The effect of this value for the various streams is:
>>>
>>>     "independent": none.
>>>     "IAB": mention that there was an IAB consensus.
>>>     "IETF": mention that there was an IETF consensus.
>>>     "IRTF": mention that there was a research group consensus (where
>>> the name of the research group is extracted from the <workgroup>
>>> element).
>>
>> Best regards, Julian
>
> Oh, Dear Lord, this is such a wonderful addition that captures the state
> of work.  It just calls out for an April 1 RFC!!!!!
> ...

FWIW, this is not new at all. It has been around for at least nine years.

What's new is just the (IMHO confusing) warning message.

Best regards, Julian