Re: [Rfc-markdown] [xml2rfc-dev] [xml2rfc] New xml2rfc release: v2.25.0

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Fri, 30 August 2019 04:54 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: rfc-markdown@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfc-markdown@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC308120C9C; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 21:54:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gmx.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UF7mMiEAZ3QX; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 21:54:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F35561200E3; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 21:54:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1567140820; bh=lyBRydSkgnxPq/pVXz/7lqebeOVJkDfohXSgbH+GVfA=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=h2tuwbL3pn908Q3d0W5fYAVMxz4YnPMk/IhQoG3CWQvQ6cXVco3f6ZED+TCbp1n4Z q1dE9K+xD/i6XGnCeYFpdDayV9F2qVijo1/rQLpBTn1BYexw7welltnszKl9zNRZqe ppYTi5rWY7+qZqtcqINqhZit8oAVcqUsDd1FVof8=
X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
Received: from [192.168.178.124] ([84.171.150.109]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M1FAK-1iIsoO2q08-00tDSF; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 06:53:40 +0200
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Cc: Robert Moskowitz <rgm@htt-consult.com>, Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>, XML Developer List <xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org>, xml2rfc@ietf.org, rfc-markdown@ietf.org
References: <E1i2EMD-0002SA-UW@durif.tools.ietf.org> <d82ab9f2-5913-ad0e-dc05-2be319480a3c@htt-consult.com> <e206317e-bb51-c9e6-9dc2-c9d86b13b9da@levkowetz.com> <8fdc91d2-a683-eb4d-04f1-ade8e424436f@htt-consult.com> <3646d280-9e8c-9b90-093d-9dd36967fc7a@gmx.de> <59EADF98-C4C3-4F82-9534-AB706199CB4F@tzi.org>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <8be273dd-6692-99d2-9162-20a7a3515605@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2019 06:53:38 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <59EADF98-C4C3-4F82-9534-AB706199CB4F@tzi.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:aLbbaErfE9a6y4Fjgbj1VCH3fpy+XyFuy9W2FDZMXm88HCX9EyD fhOqvY5c6+5oTRETMJ1icSebKx83uEUuokSoJ6zIR41jISorrWBf1DjaD2DNM0PZdqQxFn+ LHBoVT8rWXRcXftkrkU9CTKh+I8vqoPA+RZW3KqDNO82S1aOXKOeXnGn4v6Ig6lvJNk6wdn WY7/SuHrhS6SgYR1KnShg==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:24tp7r8pv7o=:xlTXfBjEZWOL7W4WZz7G/W pO91TUEU99Snlk+W7ULkOPnBrtcYEvnRJ/Ox3yHI2DXXlfylzkgcyqrAXQ/cxpvbE+FNlli9K vEqTb+No8jHGXW6ufUWlEDGjdKXqGJqqepGGyb3qomwnXR7i13Xz6ylRCEWiLMiNw+8AtjViM ZCdDX3pNaVRiCyRPtpDg73LZkCV3XDDo+FYuHxEKlpmm2PwrHozLrL0gQTmczt8htDYfv5+YV wfn72OGEhlbDvp9ScNPkHyaF2p7I7qTqx8Xwc5uLtp+31pbexSKVkjFlX9d2S1BFJr5/u42We 1c8EhzyMe430ZGz/JOb/RBx9kyppT7iTsftPkMyVs4E+vHVH886Rw9Jb7gNRJYMFdg/5DfeB1 Ff9pVJzH9G4swlZo6w6zdaYeL+H9UTLnEEPBk1krDzHpMJKdvFtXAYhBv0Unuc4kQHaoGID61 13wZPWdNBjunI9liBCc2rcq6symChI9UraH8spLxMnZJ4omN3qOWVxKnGfUAmMIRcYBbQhhj1 aiSEbnZM4KIj+QhvB7POiN51PcD0FPJSTmcbm0dEdUTtflqhlWf5i7NiLuBfuJ1w00AwWBCc3 uXSVMSEZhE2I8ykyRp59J58qTjcH9o2aoPCnW3oME29rjAXVul1rwO1LpbZ9Qn8NktJOHoa9W Rhlejm43+IxhbBCygMkcfamKm32cv93l35b75DPkNNw2Prf+MXhkdRD25W3zO/wLjfp/kzAPO HOEM++IXEXwUzA3i75wq9ef715Vag4OZmEzjS1BOQXgSyFE3rHZVX4A59LXTl65i92RfQNDQ9 8Bgrw9b4sEatzCb6TRhI+oiR8sn1xh7/WWgAO/l0xiszmf8oazFz5vk5RMADo7G1I7XRVAbsA etqefYLd9/+M0vLG9T/D9lVkJUV16XQQccHtinF/oG9rRbTgs5VrxdSOE8vaZrNhdfaj0Hlit rZwoQWIMsRKM4chnhnR4WNUaqrwqmhQIjuoVUX5m8dMbEG0j5JtyJGuPea7lcUcOW6Rt9UnJW jgvBAnA1cODa8Z6DD8h9Su9xE+IJfKXYKeQvjgZ7zQKShAe1qhon1IiZuhbaQ+H9avqPlHXa2 BA6WVkvlf8Xd7WrwUspxys75MLSGNOLqyY9cY603rTV6xHPqstXMYTYbJpRG8CcFxzj8VeHKM 7EFQ62nTq14BahUbZoQr7NF6j+qrWWGoQqExrfdwfY5wE14g==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfc-markdown/KbCt4gwYzFtNgqQBpIxR2RPfBus>
Subject: Re: [Rfc-markdown] [xml2rfc-dev] [xml2rfc] New xml2rfc release: v2.25.0
X-BeenThere: rfc-markdown@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "rfc-markdown is a discussion list for people writing I-Ds and RFCs in Markdown and the authors of the tools used for that." <rfc-markdown.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rfc-markdown>, <mailto:rfc-markdown-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfc-markdown/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-markdown@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-markdown-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-markdown>, <mailto:rfc-markdown-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2019 04:54:23 -0000

On 30.08.2019 06:43, Carsten Bormann wrote:
> On Aug 30, 2019, at 06:21, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
>>
>>> I need to find where 'consensus' is explained.
>>> ...
>>
>> <https://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc7991.html#element.rfc.attribute.consensus>
>
> I’m not sure whether you are serious when you say the attribute is “explained” there.
> Yes, there is text about this attribute.
> No, it is not explained.
> The reference to 7841 just points to more text about “consensus” there, but not about the meaning of this attribute.

There's more text at
<https://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc7991.html#attribute-consensus>;
and the main definition should reference that:

> A.3. The "consensus" Attribute
>
> For some of the publication streams (see Appendix A.2), the "Status of This Memo" section depends on whether there was a consensus to publish (again, see Section 3.4 of [RFC7841]).
>
> The consensus attribute can be used to supply this information. The acceptable values are "true" (the default) and "false"; "yes" and "no" from v2 are deprecated.
>
> The effect of this value for the various streams is:
>
>     "independent": none.
>     "IAB": mention that there was an IAB consensus.
>     "IETF": mention that there was an IETF consensus.
>     "IRTF": mention that there was a research group consensus (where the name of the research group is extracted from the <workgroup> element).

Best regards, Julian