[Rfc-markdown] Are there situations where markdown does NOT work for creating I-D's?

Dan York <york@isoc.org> Tue, 12 June 2018 13:38 UTC

Return-Path: <york@isoc.org>
X-Original-To: rfc-markdown@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfc-markdown@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5119130E3C for <rfc-markdown@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 06:38:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=isoc.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9WHracsrfwuG for <rfc-markdown@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 06:38:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from NAM05-DM3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr730062.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.73.62]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A6FA130EF2 for <Rfc-markdown@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 06:38:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=isoc.org; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=+1JiZVHSgW2f/ht0NCHn3vSNKE6jl2aaTrJGjOqSgQQ=; b=0anGdNe0Qr61eel/IQF5PyUeRRjEAY5T3mYpG9dCGBcvxQtpb0Yo/e4pUd9l5mm9HHOy4hv4+RJ5G/whgV+lefIeeQhPIhaBzRXJ6jpE+ctQuvzTVyQIyf/hSx7xJNU3wZAkREpdtghUqWZMW6ux5aCOUmc/VsWYNn6y0JSNMGo=
Received: from DM6PR06MB3977.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (20.176.67.31) by DM6PR06MB4523.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (20.176.110.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.841.17; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 13:38:50 +0000
Received: from DM6PR06MB3977.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::94e7:798c:7516:bf1f]) by DM6PR06MB3977.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::94e7:798c:7516:bf1f%3]) with mapi id 15.20.0841.019; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 13:38:50 +0000
From: Dan York <york@isoc.org>
To: "Rfc-markdown@ietf.org" <Rfc-markdown@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Are there situations where markdown does NOT work for creating I-D's?
Thread-Index: AQHUAlKyfWcouFCE8kyXqAFimO6Bdw==
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 13:38:50 +0000
Message-ID: <478A6F00-B1D6-4A0A-8EE1-834B541D5089@isoc.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=york@isoc.org;
x-originating-ip: [74.75.84.32]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; DM6PR06MB4523; 7:1Ec8zaX33Ze8QETgKxLPdVBoeqnnFMQ1hcaiTF1vY6aZRPalOMMV6WEO3R2h6ZvvnYx1yPWpNPpeukAp2rzWoJhRJn7sVsXYFcQqQMZbGhMCDcp7iU/KTNkAmlXrSbGf/rRgWF0h03DTASOXnEhsTXBblGiXK8uCJshp6uW0bVuXn4O9+oYWZjgdYzpr2S0TR7bZEY1OVvBnpCCzrG7QwzW9NLe5Plv5ILcEJFHoRNfy87tLKNjggoLonsyzXBpQ
x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SOS;
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(7020095)(4652020)(5600026)(4534165)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(2017052603328)(7153060)(49563074)(7193020); SRVR:DM6PR06MB4523;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DM6PR06MB4523:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM6PR06MB4523D89A2D6F4F739A08DFDFB77F0@DM6PR06MB4523.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(31418570063057);
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(102415395)(6040522)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(93006095)(93001095)(10201501046)(3002001)(3231254)(944501410)(52105095)(149027)(150027)(6041310)(201703131423095)(201702281528075)(20161123555045)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123560045)(20161123562045)(20161123558120)(20161123564045)(6072148)(201708071742011)(7699016); SRVR:DM6PR06MB4523; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:DM6PR06MB4523;
x-forefront-prvs: 07013D7479
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(376002)(396003)(39380400002)(39850400004)(346002)(366004)(199004)(189003)(5250100002)(53936002)(6916009)(6306002)(966005)(53376002)(68736007)(8936002)(2906002)(2501003)(3660700001)(5640700003)(3280700002)(99286004)(2616005)(236005)(14454004)(6512007)(54896002)(81166006)(66066001)(5660300001)(316002)(186003)(86362001)(26005)(478600001)(81156014)(8676002)(83716003)(6116002)(3846002)(606006)(106356001)(102836004)(36756003)(99936001)(2351001)(476003)(82746002)(105586002)(6436002)(25786009)(486006)(33656002)(6506007)(6486002)(7736002)(2900100001)(97736004); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:DM6PR06MB4523; H:DM6PR06MB3977.namprd06.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: isoc.org does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 2SFMPygtoIf3qBeBe8ewZEL//Eh4Ij+0x6ySXhLUwsw6tnLd4G9Ku/P5HcuyJVx4GjJs5UVNU+gDpHwgBwd6S+Y6OCdAtieVHalgDu3sOEnNPCwE3urw8jCoHsuAC/NLIVCFDobL2XnNhefQOuBJ0geRwdxWerzZKjMNh9yYM2WP0vlLolnKvjJAyoXs9LjY
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_0B4D16A7-6E8F-4D24-8140-AC3647865D7C"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 3f69e65c-ffc3-49da-7a68-08d5d069d51c
X-OriginatorOrg: isoc.org
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 3f69e65c-ffc3-49da-7a68-08d5d069d51c
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 12 Jun 2018 13:38:50.6943 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 89f84dfb-7285-4810-bc4d-8b9b5794554f
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM6PR06MB4523
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfc-markdown/OWHGBSRxBtHjKksxg5WlekVUW-o>
Subject: [Rfc-markdown] Are there situations where markdown does NOT work for creating I-D's?
X-BeenThere: rfc-markdown@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: "rfc-markdown is a discussion list for people writing I-Ds and RFCs in Markdown and the authors of the tools used for that." <rfc-markdown.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rfc-markdown>, <mailto:rfc-markdown-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfc-markdown/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-markdown@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-markdown-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-markdown>, <mailto:rfc-markdown-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 13:38:58 -0000

One last question before my talk tonight...  have any of you found situations where markdown does NOT work for creating Internet Drafts?
Were there situations where you needed to use XML instead of markdown?  

Or can you now do everything in markdown (variants) that you can do in xml2rfc?

All the drafts I have written lately have been relatively simple, basic text, so markdown was fine.

Just trying to anticipate questions,
Dan

--
Dan York
Director, Content & Web Strategy, Internet Society
york@isoc.org   +1-802-735-1624 
Jabber: york@jabber.isoc.org  Skype: danyork   http://twitter.com/danyork

http://www.internetsociety.org/