Re: [Rfc-markdown] [xml2rfc-dev] [xml2rfc] <br> is back, was: New xml2rfc release: v2.32.0

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Tue, 08 October 2019 16:40 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: rfc-markdown@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfc-markdown@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A02C8120018; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 09:40:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gmx.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JF0IrX7vOvlo; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 09:40:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21AC412004C; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 09:40:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1570552683; bh=DN+B/073xUN3sOncyychukfQUgn9mGP246oyvEm9dQc=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=CO1IFQmGxudVVWU4U0SzJ137vWlbr6sDBb8aJaV531x/EMn8PaxW9UgD8xgyr9Q/A 4McWCQSEus9UwCoHBc6KrHAdbMkGfRSGvwpm95ndKEcmwO+uVtoLGY53WrubRiNgB7 EaHYo5q8GiKkSIxO4D49FyutZI+J5uodygEtK7BY=
X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
Received: from [192.168.178.124] ([84.171.144.80]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx104 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MRTRN-1iUJ5D3baX-00NO19; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 18:38:02 +0200
To: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>, Sandy Ginoza <sginoza@amsl.com>, "HANSEN, TONY L" <tony@att.com>
Cc: "rfc-markdown@ietf.org" <rfc-markdown@ietf.org>, "xml2rfc@ietf.org" <xml2rfc@ietf.org>, "xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org" <xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org>, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
References: <E1iGMu9-00055y-Ui@durif.tools.ietf.org> <8304e61d-c550-91ea-9e23-eef2cd31240b@gmx.de> <A3513970-EEB0-4DBD-9E6F-A87EBFAF886D@att.com> <de4feaff-8f71-cd38-545c-2d848749251b@levkowetz.com> <f00a671a-6fe4-f5ae-2582-0b78ffa1c256@gmx.de> <1f18382c-d830-b887-f5d3-3f376ae4fdd7@gmx.de> <B15F7AF0-F5A0-401A-9F6E-F7E0E466B6A7@amsl.com> <f4f1b7ba-127a-fbfa-531b-eeff03814281@gmx.de> <71bc8d39-d06c-d900-cc8e-04a48218d75f@gmail.com> <0905DADC-E9D5-47A7-B610-F8A62686D2BD@att.com> <07DBAE10-D1FA-45C4-B7A2-321B265CA302@amsl.com> <c88388ff-84ae-c5f5-e093-e9aee77da3d6@levkowetz.com>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <8f85bec4-9be0-d7f3-0726-1d6d51668fc5@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2019 18:37:59 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <c88388ff-84ae-c5f5-e093-e9aee77da3d6@levkowetz.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:QSwSpAs1SGNRy+gXpKmJ2g0p0wz/l32n10MZeyeUV3laziiB0EF GpjDokAOIXOkaR6Wf3hkikLoPIsC3lmwnnqqVLAGuLKVJwIOHDX7LvGGH4BklFhFVtR1f1d 9GZ9bb/0JY4Cr8rybNYMTgkRGESNgE+HAMiDPw7QzMH2AeYyZz04SQ0xbz3eiCSvs4ZrbQa 0FRoqM2HxhRpRTnbbRnJA==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:qfTtpsmyJUc=:Obf1EuqO1vKEl2a9LgO+Eo lX0dZODkto/aVgcIkN0Y49cAQBIc9gJfGXhPSCKgNzMF8fEWTS2Ew9i6yTd5m8oU/nSlREpIS 2LYqE7uWPrPQ4moTXqnvq1zgMF2uKajLvuzFjPTUniqiPksTSkKImw7Ed/R4sLI08HJfhY3P7 VloX3mJ4f8yAYQu+q9OQJyTSuF9X/urds3BIfe0quBIvPA1y/bhiL76O3nv09mNrmNp7xsfod PbIeWS4in+FKvzMtJ+616chOIO1Ssh0HGt01vUFvkhjw6sQHGEtB2OXyFinrXpHGdSVQd4SfU sp77t+mkfOfdf97BdXk4sF+4omKaO7GAuWsdPs+aPunBul6P5qCBWkE2+8Z7sg7EtnY4cyVGF eyOCl2dYcX/12wxpfNsYZFnoQ7cHE4z16Y+Cm0Qd1bfaPM2UDYty3rf7GM/RQr1O7PnLQBZtY zGXCuN1NXEpk4ATVl78eUES5DcboiZLChd05ab6SxKdHhMUPl7X8WARkaS843nj0FJz+lIMPk ZicdomEyY7iNucQOuYBcvOa6Tybb7FHdFnI1zHkSupE0x4/TAdFuU2wyAD1LB++FjCwhAhStO 9sVCrb5zr+JD1j/5+lsHAYe8To6A2ZEQf4xOMkyu9TJIAZ0jKp3t3yWxRBCHcbqfBAyQSgsPv ubzbNUP2BjXpovMNWHQ4eZE9aTlAi4CLRUR1HuF2c76RSm9rP2jDV7z6jsqsXyKQID5i6By2X m9R5JDvIO1MAXNzsUnrq5OEXb+0bhgUO9hqu+BwjA34WwgQIVjK/YWQMgkfoZdjna6h84CBsv WppXVsBZdILjmn4DBQtA0QA/dCqJ71jiicna479E3d/wNDqzt0Fa5IxBIQMu/+abyNjiBKz44 iaqE+SOHZPv0GD9oESidCdMKUt8UYIJxfmfFnVc7Wpw3NjR+MsW5NoJJSsr2ERJi6q2OFexax ZgdGCul3VFSVkxiNzRc/NhCVMxRrA0shjMdZFBH7ZgojDQA//JRWdyeUQqaFXKjFZvaPYP41Y A6WieRfSpIp310RaivppbW+DPnoyxdpO1ay0EtlUfgtKEwS2ZII5V6zPtpS8J8GWsTwYe7RIP /nCKA3wMT9nYRyIjppLd0IaMXi6MlbyM8q6OP4r9yjbkOqEaFKtdEn0D+jIFfWZscaXhxowlI gEEfIuja0kVVrq8DLxlLR5K1a//xbAm004UhZ6o+47pZyzBOloVagHBbDHGagFA0HAJ3MMvwo uywb20g5imNMvomWGxhCirOCPp9e8riifoIuEXkEkDvUFDl4yGNTKKFyNcnA=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfc-markdown/WCyZMyCA6gSD8XYk2ZeXLREWYjI>
Subject: Re: [Rfc-markdown] [xml2rfc-dev] [xml2rfc] <br> is back, was: New xml2rfc release: v2.32.0
X-BeenThere: rfc-markdown@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "rfc-markdown is a discussion list for people writing I-Ds and RFCs in Markdown and the authors of the tools used for that." <rfc-markdown.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rfc-markdown>, <mailto:rfc-markdown-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfc-markdown/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-markdown@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-markdown-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-markdown>, <mailto:rfc-markdown-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2019 16:40:50 -0000

On 08.10.2019 18:17, Henrik Levkowetz wrote:
>
> On 2019-10-08 17:21, Sandy Ginoza wrote:
>> Hi Tony,
>>
>>> On Oct 6, 2019, at 7:20 PM, HANSEN, TONY L <tony@att.com>; wrote:
>>>
>>> Sandy, does the RPC feel that the ability to add a line break is needed?
>>
>> Yes, the RPC would appreciate being able to use <br>.
>
>
> Ok, I then propose that we permit <br> in body text, including lists and
> tables, and in document and section titles.  More specifically, I propose to
 > ...

If we do allow it in titles, we'll have to specify and test what happens
when you have an <xref> with format="title" to those.

That said: what's the use case for titles? Is this to control line
breaking, or to introduce the concept of a secondary title? In the
latter case, we may want to do it differently.

Best regards, Julian