[Rfc-markdown] initials handling, was: [xml2rfc] New xml2rfc release: v2.22.3

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Mon, 08 April 2019 11:51 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: rfc-markdown@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfc-markdown@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC24412006F; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 04:51:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gmx.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T7eVwU_y0lDI; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 04:51:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D33C512004A; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 04:51:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1554724252; bh=srAEssMxk1IYamV0S3t0R9uIh9RRqCeNOmLusyjcj1E=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=W/9LRrrUdDabQRTgh4RAYgdb+XnHQ1dxmKywxNJ9kdKWsy0rnAZ0Jeev7f0p+eauk U6nKOGB1NqBMUsp6JtTWiyKaS0mKLHxUY02KakjuJSGBBl6sJFfHZpvnv0yfT0U8cn Kmsf8hZ7T3BHg7RNLltkOVT2NJSGkLr1d7gTpch0=
X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
Received: from [192.168.1.34] ([217.91.35.233]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MZOan-1hTlA12l6j-00LGMm; Mon, 08 Apr 2019 13:50:52 +0200
To: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>, xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org, xml2rfc@ietf.org
Cc: rfc-markdown@ietf.org
References: <E1hDSIW-0008DY-Hl@durif.tools.ietf.org>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <c8d8c9e9-88dd-8c49-c1d4-e0438c56a03c@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 13:50:52 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <E1hDSIW-0008DY-Hl@durif.tools.ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:sfSF7BT0yE3g3k5x85a486TXEX+mFnLhs6O4bbTNCu5olE/R3pA xB0J5Af7FDHkSkEbftJvY7Sv8Kl0ln08BTFG/CKFR45rMUSB6CmNh6L25zmUMddhySigIcR Dqq8m6yv00gSsIYXpOpPQWesba78VZqJ/UhSKh7g84mhw1RJdj9lfD58it2IUzzSD3nd/qn CAqyuxlMiTyfs6NwB3K5g==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:clitbyCerR4=:TCJPQGYtXM40Zhz8l6mujH iPubeGXd1Gu3NIuSlxKvinS+KeLYymFXXPusUtSXkqjT8SQjhKnZmo0aKMKyLxc5Luep8GxiU vJg37QTBCutHQ0Q0PbeCndBKKAn8Ei3HEirw65J/Pzq5qpOP6YDoVLKWW8TIAA7V3CPEse7Wq b3JJ1+JvsgVd/F/hpdXyDKOCU4ihhboE/+KZCXXc+9ANPhWwxwDcHWRU6u+JONLbHBdVc9tV9 6K3djCpHGbqlZ0lF3mJlJZkfZAN1Av5ecvOxbvOWCxwj8GNNzH0zHQQYCCDQlmn1VakM7s+Nv ltHsOHeWP54BlBLsow+viGFnd8leCO6y2IfYicdpAeD6Lpy2M9fikaMVoVUBZriQGPOtbCrgv SqFzjBixai7phK3mh0T0zLvzX/zgjlaFLUzYyX6r72Y2eOobc8bz/conRlBUGbHW8gm/spZon WInOm6oUghGXBhU6sKGeYGf2s456KPfaqNuPo5LkKtzGRdP4AuqrV3HQzqZcPaCXhqo59kdZE jOXQA3xlKhd+9g7BdDSE+VAwKtwXVLLxYL6M5R/2uIG5fH9odNsDD/WGezkPaWmryAnGu24Pz woT/ekaFHMbZU1Nw1irjEjyq9IYio+jWPZd971tE85FMD6xFImTjyeCkC7+hwPPIVuA4xVERm u/nClXFAkSAoNXN5tPF+eeytKACRqpMySvceCrO59NmwUTQ9hJx29c9bgsoRNaoej0Uq2nrIo 07fJehRviu5ZYD9aOc15+Y/n7XHEVjL3Euz4nr8AopWy7s4r8N45sFbUsDPweUqVEJjww8ejn hgwr+Eo0QbPm/7Bcw/GbTM2c8XTMyVcRtZXtrj8CKVwB/k4PNo+/o+9Nn3m23gv9CT6gA5fqe h5StMY3/+d1c5EStmY7sjBH4DuhRXx1a6gDmYNaKvbPPcVhcfnHhEXoG3dCzsLTp8kOEHiaHh KKQuPh8dDuQ==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfc-markdown/igxk5pd7O0xy3D9TPuAfagA3CkE>
Subject: [Rfc-markdown] initials handling, was: [xml2rfc] New xml2rfc release: v2.22.3
X-BeenThere: rfc-markdown@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "rfc-markdown is a discussion list for people writing I-Ds and RFCs in Markdown and the authors of the tools used for that." <rfc-markdown.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rfc-markdown>, <mailto:rfc-markdown-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfc-markdown/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-markdown@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-markdown-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-markdown>, <mailto:rfc-markdown-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2019 11:51:11 -0000

On 08.04.2019 13:18, Henrik Levkowetz wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This is an automatic notification about a new xml2rfc release,
> v2.22.3, generated when running the mkrelease script.
>
> Release notes:
>
> xml2rfc (2.22.3) ietf; urgency=medium
>
>    This release brings further tweaks and imporvements to the v3 text
>    format output in the area of Table of Content formatting, and fixes a
>    number of bugs.
>
>    * Tweaked the handling of ToC page numbers in the v3 text format.
>
>    * Tweaked the xml inserted by the preptool for the ToC to give ToC
>      indentation and spacing which better match the legacy text format
>      (and also looks better).
>
>    * Added a rewrite of <svg> viewBox values to the simplest acceptable
>      format, to make sure it will be understood by our pdf generation libs.
>
>    * Added a test case for <xref section=...>
>
>    * Tweaked the section label for fragment <xref> rendering to say
>      'Appendix' instead of 'Section' for appendix references.
>
>    * Added a pre-rfc1272 reference to elements.xml to test the author
>      initials handling for early RFCs.
>
>    * Tweaked the get_initials() code for use on <reference> authors.
>      Refactored part of the text.render_reference() code to support
>      get_initials() properly.
>
>    * Added special initials handling for RFCs 1272 and below, to apply the
>      single initials handling enforced at that time.
> ...

Shouldn't the initials handling depend on what RFC the reference appears
in (as opposed to what RFC is being cited)???

Best regards, Julian