From nobody Wed Oct 27 14:58:37 2021 Return-Path: X-Original-To: rfc-markdown@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: rfc-markdown@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BF7C3A1578 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 14:58:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.899 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B37dZYfCg2Kr for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 14:58:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DFDC3A1593 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 14:58:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9237018021 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 17:59:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id TvNJ-8qg83_n for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 17:59:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE9E31801B for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 17:59:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 248E044F for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 17:58:12 -0400 (EDT) From: Michael Richardson To: Rfc-markdown@ietf.org X-Attribution: mcr X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1 X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m Archived-At: Subject: [Rfc-markdown] rfc-editor/to-be-removed X-BeenThere: rfc-markdown@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "rfc-markdown is a discussion list for people writing I-Ds and RFCs in Markdown and the authors of the tools used for that." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 21:58:35 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I recently learn of the --- to_be_removed_note_Discussion_Venues addition. (I usually learn of new stuff because I see Carsten use stuff.) I don't see it at: https://github.com/cabo/kramdown-rfc2629/wiki/Syntax but maybe it's hiding in some abuse of another mechanism. I'm working on a document with a bunch of internal comments, to be removed = by RFC-editor, but useful for the WG to know about. I thought I could use the above mechanism inside of "middle", but that doesn't work. Is there something I should use? I know that we once had a discussion about how to do comments, and I think we concluded that