Re: [Rfc-markdown] 1.3.34: map most codeblock classes to <sourcecode> instead of <artwork>

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Fri, 19 February 2021 07:33 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: rfc-markdown@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfc-markdown@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 370C13A1193 for <rfc-markdown@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 23:33:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uNvqDOIFVeIc for <rfc-markdown@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 23:33:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD6BC3A118F for <rfc-markdown@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 23:33:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.217.152] (p5089a828.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.137.168.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Dhjwy3ChpzyNK; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 08:33:22 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.60.0.2.21\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <20210219072402.GA151175@miek.nl>
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 08:33:21 +0100
Cc: rfc-markdown@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <08FE1EB3-5D3F-41CF-B623-F664DB3746A7@tzi.org>
References: <4E1735EC-A5DD-4201-A6EA-2285D5CC9C21@tzi.org> <20210219072402.GA151175@miek.nl>
To: Miek Gieben <miek@miek.nl>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.60.0.2.21)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfc-markdown/zW4IkcfNzGL2HC03FDSv5luth9U>
Subject: Re: [Rfc-markdown] 1.3.34: map most codeblock classes to <sourcecode> instead of <artwork>
X-BeenThere: rfc-markdown@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "rfc-markdown is a discussion list for people writing I-Ds and RFCs in Markdown and the authors of the tools used for that." <rfc-markdown.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rfc-markdown>, <mailto:rfc-markdown-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfc-markdown/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-markdown@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-markdown-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-markdown>, <mailto:rfc-markdown-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 07:33:27 -0000

On 19. Feb 2021, at 08:24, Miek Gieben <miek@miek.nl> wrote:
> 
> Regarding your other email on the alignment of artwork vs sourcecode, I think that must
> be fixed in the schema, rather than working around it from our side.

Yes.  The question really is on what timescales this can happen.
We have been waiting for some fixes for some time.
RFCEDP is still discussing on one end.
Somebody has to do the xml2rfc fixes on the other side.
Let’s see...

Grüße, Carsten