IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Rfced-future] **Consensus check on part of Issue 13: Is decision making in the strategy body open to all?**

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Fri, 27 November 2020 15:40 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 473EE3A0045 for <rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 07:40:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IPIONoEfhDlY for <rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 07:40:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB5833A003E for <rfced-future@iab.org>; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 07:40:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1543; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1606491602; x=1607701202; h=from:mime-version:subject:message-id:date:to; bh=C7RJJi2tCR23KkNBzaL0FcEOjrh1mFYHLEoQiunKS5s=; b=Wh+dWmkoV+/99MVn2ToQdLmQashpU8hk4Lf4F65X9XgqYBHSJOuin4/j HS7oEkjWcRYmKpI8svmEZ4cts9XRM9Qm64Yi1/40LgrELuU65aDjvO7cR 6AXtLVGmNp6hC37uO7naCpRwnWXgu5qDoinEyiJ79UVZS3TYWvwH73ykU 0=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 488
X-IPAS-Result: A0ACBACJHcFf/xbLJq1iHQEBAQEJARIBBQUBgg+DdQEgEoRriQWkVQQHAQEBCgMBAS8EAQGGdiY4EwIDAQEBAwIDAQEBAQUBAQECAQYEcYVthhyBMwKEGAGDBqEVjhx2gTKKZhCBOIFTjAiCAIE4HIInbIULgkqCXwScYJwKgnmDHYE3llgDH4MLEoodhSaPNLBpg2oCBAYFAhWBbSOBVzMaCBsVZQGCPz0SGQ2OWI4TQANnAgYBCQEBAwmPdwEB
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.78,374,1599523200"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="31457880"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-2.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 27 Nov 2020 15:39:57 +0000
Received: from [10.61.164.156] ([10.61.164.156]) by aer-core-2.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 0ARFdvGL014894 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <rfced-future@iab.org>; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 15:39:57 GMT
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_C9B790FB-BF72-47C2-B001-68AFAA10CF34"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha256"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
Message-Id: <5EE071CB-30CA-474F-BFA5-45129FFFFCBA@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2020 16:39:56 +0100
To: rfced-future@iab.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.61.164.156, [10.61.164.156]
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-2.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfced-future/DVexg71AXVruGXKV2VImq65J5Q0>
Subject: [Rfced-future] **Consensus check on part of Issue 13: Is decision making in the strategy body open to all?**
X-BeenThere: rfced-future@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Editor Future Development Program <rfced-future.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/rfced-future>, <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfced-future/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfced-future@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/rfced-future>, <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2020 15:40:03 -0000

Please let us know in within the next three weeks if you disagree with any of the following:

• The chairs think that everybody agrees that there is some strategic body

• The chairs think that strategic decisions get documented in RFCs

• The chairs think that there is consensus that the strategic body is open to all to engage openly, and that meetings should be open, minuted, agendas posted.  This is not to say that there is consensus about how the strategic body is composed.

These points obviously do not close Issue 13.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email