From nobody Mon Aug 10 06:50:26 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACBDA3A157C for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 06:50:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.888 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.888 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=brianrosen-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iwoDijg_pe-s for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 06:50:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-io1-xd42.google.com (mail-io1-xd42.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F4593A1574 for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 06:50:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-io1-xd42.google.com with SMTP id q75so8941026iod.1 for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 06:50:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=brianrosen-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=1l4U166QHzIisdIVya9LzjyXhGwCePNNDI1w/c8GsxM=; b=LjKGvW1r6ZQ9OzpCepiicAYejHljfWdj1CqJOS14TZodfux1wge5ewGJAY2z5ub1UV wvjEfSt/EKtB+xI9YxkssyaOzOQSDYq38hXSyRLm+qiqschxk8Im3/0oz9bBp6YGjMgJ 7XzoBj86jKvdAZtVvPa0T6MmTEiG14yVQoSwdGmGt8cbYmcfENT462dX7dpv27v89LyF SnPcyFOVERtsktap3RiBeXjeIz1195WpioTgv4BCp41tJeoGztC8yaUCCe49VJLGDZhJ Oy60Uh4p7UuXtOX3ukrdT9W7mYV9Aa9Ub5OAqR4T1svt5tOwfxYjsMAq68zM0balKLQk CmGA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=1l4U166QHzIisdIVya9LzjyXhGwCePNNDI1w/c8GsxM=; b=PFqOnAu3/3ogx/bBR8Jr5/NYZ7yr83LP82WDEA/TrYtcsgGVzq+qUIkeUAowhZABPs KBE8U2lL2YPvOqBBTI9TTHMf5GXwLsEY2QIqmimCf8ZwZFzZKupExtYR385/uLBrq7EE 0Mcv2a6qYzv5SJoZAkVLtlbIt1k1+DK+HIU/lleqf2nnEToa6AwQtYP5GJPeaJCNAKS/ rAasdJmOvAzUvaSQfgWbDiR2Xe/YNptBgPed9oPj1/qQdc9s0fIm5lJPDW+ff2lCSdWD LhI53QetaSxeq/6dD9PmMaxu6WscbnX5ygrMJhX6AyCBHjZ1rL993AgB8sRvvw6O0fa9 fsHQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531xObG9I94jSBE5G36tOhuEJaIyv/Z990AzosrjBfhifPJ970ww pBBgbctljUp+0SRSHY6xkD+yYM6N538= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzSle3qrTShF/RgaUNXhCBVONozrG75pLM3aFR4B+W15+fsTenkYY0dQKybsxTc3/UwC1MvDQ== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:9c0c:: with SMTP id 12mr17917341ioe.142.1597067420801; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 06:50:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brians-mbp-2871.lan (dynamic-acs-24-154-119-158.zoominternet.net. [24.154.119.158]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j8sm11590388ilc.43.2020.08.10.06.50.20 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 10 Aug 2020 06:50:20 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\)) From: Brian Rosen In-Reply-To: <7d7a228a-5182-4afc-b804-1ab0c5250ac2@www.fastmail.com> Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 09:50:19 -0400 Cc: rfced-future@iab.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <89EA2360-A6A3-4E17-B39C-A457EB9ADD45@brianrosen.net> References: <7d7a228a-5182-4afc-b804-1ab0c5250ac2@www.fastmail.com> To: Martin Thomson X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2) Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Rfced-future] Next Step - proposals? X-BeenThere: rfced-future@iab.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Editor Future Development Program List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 13:50:25 -0000 Great, thanks. Let=E2=80=99s keep those proposals coming. Doesn=E2=80=99= t have to be pretty, just get the ideas down. Brian > On Aug 9, 2020, at 10:43 PM, Martin Thomson wrote: >=20 > Hi Brian, >=20 > I just updated and posted = . I = believe that the original did address your requirements already, but = I've added a little bit more content and made a few corrections. >=20 > Cheers, > Martin >=20 > On Sat, Aug 8, 2020, at 00:55, Brian Rosen wrote: >> Dear colleagues, >>=20 >> The chairs would like to thank you for participating in the IETF 108=20= >> meeting of the RFC Editor Futures program. We learned quite a bit at=20= >> that meeting, not the least of which was that the group is not yet=20 >> prepared to choose a direction. >>=20 >> Therefore, what we are thinking is that the next step should be for=20= >> people to develop fleshed out proposals. It would be good to have=20 >> several alternatives that explore the different philosophies that = have=20 >> been expressed in the group. Each proposal should be very clear on a=20= >> few points: >>=20 >> * Overall motivation and philosophy >> * What each proposed entity is responsible for >> * What the relationship of each entity is to other entities=20 >> * What accountability, selection, and transparency mechanisms are in=20= >> play for each entity >>=20 >> The next step would be for us to discuss these proposals and see if = we=20 >> can find some common ground. Our thinking is that we would appoint a=20= >> neutral editor to document that common ground, which could come from=20= >> any proposal. >>=20 >> The timing for any interim to discuss these depends very much on = having=20 >> proposals. There are some drafts already of course, and we hope we = can=20 >> have more soon. >>=20 >> Thoughts? >>=20 >> Eliot and Brian >> --=20 >> Rfced-future mailing list >> Rfced-future@iab.org >> https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/rfced-future >>=20 >=20 > --=20 > Rfced-future mailing list > Rfced-future@iab.org > https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/rfced-future