IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Rfced-future] Model proposal

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Mon, 13 July 2020 07:24 UTC

Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2EAC3A0968 for <rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 00:24:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.219
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.219 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cryptonector.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xPzzkaovUNzE for <rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 00:24:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dog.ash.relay.mailchannels.net (dog.ash.relay.mailchannels.net [23.83.222.48]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD5A03A0916 for <rfced-future@iab.org>; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 00:24:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71C93180D78; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 07:24:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a12.g.dreamhost.com (100-96-23-20.trex.outbound.svc.cluster.local [100.96.23.20]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E3CDA180DB0; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 07:24:42 +0000 (UTC)
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a12.g.dreamhost.com (pop.dreamhost.com [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 0.0.0.0:2500 (trex/5.18.8); Mon, 13 Jul 2020 07:24:43 +0000
X-MC-Relay: Neutral
X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost
X-Drop-Robust: 0bb4d2c41c3bd124_1594625083223_1174395756
X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1594625083223:934867191
X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1594625083223
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a12.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a12.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B2CB7F1A5; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 00:24:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h=date :from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=cryptonector.com; bh=jKk6fAFKCgTOEl rkmfe5bKD0mck=; b=mN5F5LoJ68W7zPFP0Oml7du/VcaNKoMaasVfW1oX9nBDcp m6vCkgFf4IEm4kqEXNUBv00cVExXlmsMNTW6V4RORJnurisFwQBComkbtJZvamoA hIi6RzdOaAfg0iu+6t6EKVUh2skivBLNPI3Pe9NVAHlCCuCTJn4h+NgfmOM48=
Received: from localhost (unknown [24.28.108.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a12.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 577438015B; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 00:24:40 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 02:24:15 -0500
X-DH-BACKEND: pdx1-sub0-mail-a12
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Cc: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>, rfced-future@iab.org
Message-ID: <20200713072413.GY3100@localhost>
References: <d1f33279-0656-4caa-81e7-aa665d3a4acb@www.fastmail.com> <098fb5bf-f65c-d741-5fa7-baa6ae2c8358@nostrum.com> <F30FBA82-510C-4DC1-8535-FFA30345CEA7@kuehlewind.net> <DE2B2759-03FF-4D2C-B765-3C7C9AFA0955@vigilsec.com> <2A7C36D3-62CD-4BA0-88BE-F19A06D991DB@sobco.com> <48E30FDD-24B1-4602-9740-BB4DA2A4A7C1@sobco.com> <9A6E6D1C-FD14-4285-92A2-2483D9452CE9@vigilsec.com> <14ef71ed-8f2f-22f4-edf0-ca22b004ec7c@gmail.com> <9d390288-1056-4997-a540-96510e19a099@www.fastmail.com> <3bb43b97-211b-cee3-c365-906192c4b337@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3bb43b97-211b-cee3-c365-906192c4b337@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
X-VR-OUT-STATUS: OK
X-VR-OUT-SCORE: -100
X-VR-OUT-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrvdejgdduvddvucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuggftfghnshhusghstghrihgsvgdpffftgfetoffjqffuvfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjfgesthdtredttdervdenucfhrhhomheppfhitghoucghihhllhhirghmshcuoehnihgtohestghrhihpthhonhgvtghtohhrrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpefftdektefhueetveeigfefgeejteejvdfhhefgvddtfeeujeehleeguefhgffhgfenucfkphepvdegrddvkedruddtkedrudekfeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhhouggvpehsmhhtphdphhgvlhhopehlohgtrghlhhhoshhtpdhinhgvthepvdegrddvkedruddtkedrudekfedprhgvthhurhhnqdhprghthheppfhitghoucghihhllhhirghmshcuoehnihgtohestghrhihpthhonhgvtghtohhrrdgtohhmqedpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehnihgtohestghrhihpthhonhgvtghtohhrrdgtohhmpdhnrhgtphhtthhopehnihgtohestghrhihpthhonhgvtghtohhrrdgtohhm
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfced-future/dQj1RyRHoEaUfPWFrUbeVEYtbrM>
Subject: Re: [Rfced-future] Model proposal
X-BeenThere: rfced-future@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Editor Future Development Program <rfced-future.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/rfced-future>, <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfced-future/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfced-future@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/rfced-future>, <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 07:24:50 -0000

On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 05:52:08PM +1200, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> On 13-Jul-20 11:16, Martin Thomson wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 11, 2020, at 06:57, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> > 
> > I stand by the formal piece.  My logic is that we should not create
> > a new body for this process.  Of the bodies we have, the IAB is most
> > suitable.
> 
> Yes. The alternative is a new body. As I've said repeatedly since
> about 1995, I'd like to see the IAB freed up to do nothing but things
> related to Architecture. I count IANA and liaisons as part of that,
> but not running a publishing service.

We almost certainly don't need a new body for this -- is there even
enough work for it?  We weren't happy with the RSOC...  I do, though,
understand and sympathize with the desire to free up the IAB to work
only on architecture -- I just don't see how to shift this
responsibility elsewhere.

Nico
--

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email