IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Rfced-future] ** Consensus check on part of Issue 12: Is the person an advisor (RSA) or an Executive Editor (RSE) **

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Fri, 27 November 2020 15:36 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB9133A1033 for <rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 07:36:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 60m5UvTbcYnT for <rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 07:36:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5427F3A102F for <rfced-future@iab.org>; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 07:36:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1622; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1606491408; x=1607701008; h=from:mime-version:subject:message-id:date:to; bh=U47qjb0Ya9633YY8ja2xKM7fnexq/acStMuxWUNK6KU=; b=ixHgZ/dqSAN+rodt5/PUn9t3nJ72XoJPewydOrwtsVd8d4FJMnuplb7g VeO2+c2XIypEH5Z6r4gX+d+rRkZHd7tFb4wn+/8J+Qqt8r4uLiMkf1x4b /C/KGmjYnYjNPtwuo3qLfYy96lEo3fpaJdGtxC2OHgMKuF6DR4Zh/gvW/ A=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 488
X-IPAS-Result: A0ACBQDNG8Ff/xbLJq1iHQEBAQEJARIBBQUBgg+DdQEgEoRriQWHf5xXBAcBAQEKAwEBLwQBAYZ2JjgTAgMBAQEDAgMBAQEBBQEBAQIBBgRxhW2GHIEsBwKEGAGDBqESjhx2gTKKbRCBOIFTjAiCAIE4DBCCJ2yFC4JKM4IsBJxgnAqCeYMdgTeWWAMfgx2KHYUmjzSwaYNqAgQGBQIVgW0jgVczGggbFWUBgj89EhkNjliOE0ADZwIGAQkBAQMJj3cBAQ
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.78,374,1599523200"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="31459827"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 27 Nov 2020 15:36:44 +0000
Received: from [10.61.164.156] ([10.61.164.156]) by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 0ARFahXk028379 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <rfced-future@iab.org>; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 15:36:44 GMT
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_72458E74-396B-46DF-A092-CD7B3B62565D"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha256"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
Message-Id: <4A34B713-E013-4A36-9296-694F07EC5AC5@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2020 16:36:43 +0100
To: rfced-future@iab.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.61.164.156, [10.61.164.156]
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-1.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfced-future/mBWQVZM-Ol_dwbZL2zpt60RwLXw>
Subject: [Rfced-future] ** Consensus check on part of Issue 12: Is the person an advisor (RSA) or an Executive Editor (RSE) **
X-BeenThere: rfced-future@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Editor Future Development Program <rfced-future.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/rfced-future>, <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfced-future/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfced-future@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/rfced-future>, <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2020 15:36:50 -0000

As mentioned in the minutes:

Please let us know if you disagree with any of the following:


• The chairs think that there is likely rough consensus that role of the chair and the RS[EA] should be split.

• The chairs think we have consensus that that person can raise issues to the strategic group

• The chairs think there is likely rough consensus that the person does not make strategic decisions but that those are decided by the strategic body

• The chairs think there is likely rough consensus that the person does not direct the RPC/REP.


This does not resolve all of issue 12, of course.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email