Re: [Rfced-future] Consensus check: Issue 22 – new stream for RFC Editor
Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org> Tue, 22 June 2021 23:44 UTC
Return-Path: <jay@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23A333A1FA3 for <rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 16:44:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zHwIHPWxbPtO; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 16:44:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [158.140.230.105]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1D47B3A1FA2; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 16:44:27 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <1841B01F-42B9-4515-9819-1CA14FA5FA65@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_E77B967F-8C73-4044-B9FF-9D3EBC17D27D"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.100.0.2.22\))
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2021 11:44:24 +1200
In-Reply-To: <7ef10df2-cb21-a95b-b977-286b6d8a8405@lear.ch>
Cc: rfced-future@iab.org
To: Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch>
References: <7ef10df2-cb21-a95b-b977-286b6d8a8405@lear.ch>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.100.0.2.22)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfced-future/oWlc4QjjVpPuPO8_kbXaZfyPcvc>
Subject: Re: [Rfced-future] Consensus check: Issue 22 – new stream for RFC Editor
X-BeenThere: rfced-future@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Editor Future Development Program <rfced-future.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/rfced-future>, <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfced-future/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfced-future@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/rfced-future>, <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2021 23:44:34 -0000
> On 23/06/2021, at 2:51 AM, Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch> wrote: > > In yesterday's meeting there was general consensus that there should be a new stream, and that the RSE/A should manage it. Thinking about this overnight, it seems misaligned with the rest of the proposed new structure for the RSE/A to manage this stream. The new process is quite clear that all of the content of this new stream is generated by the RSWG and approved by the RSAB, so would it not make more sense for the RSAB to manage this stream? If not then I’d like to understand why it should be the RSE/A and what "manage" means in practice given this new process, because AFAICT it doesn’t mean anything. Jay > The general argument was that there should be no supervisory check performed by the IAB after the RSAB has approved a document. > > Please send any concerns by 6 July. > > Eliot > > > -- > Rfced-future mailing list > Rfced-future@iab.org > https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/rfced-future -- Jay Daley IETF Executive Director jay@ietf.org
- [Rfced-future] Consensus check: Issue 22 – new st… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Rfced-future] Consensus check: Issue 22 – ne… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [Rfced-future] Consensus check: Issue 22 – ne… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Rfced-future] Consensus check: Issue 22 – ne… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [Rfced-future] Consensus check: Issue 22 – ne… Martin Thomson
- Re: [Rfced-future] Consensus check: Issue 22 – ne… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Rfced-future] Consensus check: Issue 22 – ne… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Rfced-future] Consensus check: Issue 22 – ne… Michael StJohns
- Re: [Rfced-future] Consensus check: Issue 22 – ne… Jay Daley
- Re: [Rfced-future] Consensus check: Issue 22 – ne… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Rfced-future] Consensus check: Issue 22 – ne… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [Rfced-future] Consensus check: Issue 22 – ne… Jay Daley
- Re: [Rfced-future] Consensus check: Issue 22 – ne… Martin Thomson
- Re: [Rfced-future] Consensus check: Issue 22 – ne… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Rfced-future] Consensus check: Issue 22 – ne… Jay Daley
- Re: [Rfced-future] Consensus check: Issue 22 – ne… Joel Halpern Direct
- Re: [Rfced-future] Consensus check: Issue 22 – ne… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [Rfced-future] Consensus check: Issue 22 – ne… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Rfced-future] Consensus check: Issue 22 – ne… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Rfced-future] Consensus check: Issue 22 – ne… Michael StJohns
- [Rfced-future] BCP or not [was: Consensus check: … Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Rfced-future] Consensus check: Issue 22 – ne… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Rfced-future] Consensus check: Issue 22 – ne… Jay Daley
- Re: [Rfced-future] Consensus check: Issue 22 – ne… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Rfced-future] Consensus check: Issue 22 – ne… Lars Eggert
- Re: [Rfced-future] Consensus check: Issue 22 – ne… Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [Rfced-future] Consensus check: Issue 22 – ne… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Rfced-future] Consensus check: Issue 22 – ne… Mirja Kuehlewind
- Re: [Rfced-future] Consensus check: Issue 22 – ne… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [Rfced-future] Consensus check: Issue 22 – ne… Mirja Kuehlewind
- Re: [Rfced-future] Consensus check: Issue 22 – ne… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Rfced-future] Consensus check: Issue 22 – ne… Christian Huitema
- Re: [Rfced-future] Consensus check: Issue 22 – ne… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [Rfced-future] Consensus check: Issue 22 – ne… Michael StJohns
- Re: [Rfced-future] Consensus check: Issue 22 – ne… Bob Hinden
- Re: [Rfced-future] Consensus check: Issue 22 – ne… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [Rfced-future] Consensus check: Issue 22 – ne… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [Rfced-future] Consensus check: Issue 22 – ne… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [Rfced-future] Consensus check: Issue 22 – ne… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [Rfced-future] Consensus check: Issue 22 – ne… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [Rfced-future] Consensus check: Issue 22 – ne… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [Rfced-future] Consensus check: Issue 22 – ne… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Rfced-future] Consensus check: Issue 22 – ne… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Rfced-future] Consensus check: Issue 22 – ne… Joel Halpern Direct
- Re: [Rfced-future] Consensus check: Issue 22 – ne… Brian E Carpenter
- [Rfced-future] RSAB membership (was Re: Consensus… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Rfced-future] RSAB membership (was Re: Conse… Brian E Carpenter