IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Rfced-future] ** Consensus check on part of Issue 12: Is the person an advisor (RSA) or an Executive Editor (RSE) **

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Fri, 27 November 2020 16:31 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69E133A0844 for <rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 08:31:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P2DJtCHrJ17U for <rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 08:31:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-3.cisco.com (aer-iport-3.cisco.com [173.38.203.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85CA63A083F for <rfced-future@iab.org>; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 08:31:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1838; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1606494661; x=1607704261; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc: to:references; bh=RF02Xl5iD80S/HAcCGHiWzsHG0qGu7Za9+rzWcZVahU=; b=b+GB4STDGxHkwN2Qszvy0X1H5y3MxqUu2/z9iYakKxl2R+TTJ5pikF6o tRB6PW6LD+S8WuA23ylXaWM/fF5a5kT6lltGmGJAUwppIG71LDW1kCGpL q6ANdLRA7Ns3JTeIlUcZhRoqB6Otr+CLqKG758074e5bxL2SU/RBawxmb Y=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 488
X-IPAS-Result: A0BIAABaKcFf/xbLJq1iHAEBAQEBAQcBARIBAQQEAQGBfAYBAQsBg3QBIBIuhD2JBYd+J5o0gXwEBAMBAQEKAwEBLwQBAYRKAoIqJjUIDgIDAQEBAwIDAQEBAQUBAQECAQYEcYVthXIBAQEDASNWBQsLGCMHAgJXGYMmAYJmIK5NBlN2gTKFV4UJEDeBAQGBUowIggCBOAwQgicuPoULgkozgiwEnGCKXJEugnmDHYE3llgDH5JgjzSwaYNqAgQGBQIVgVgCNoFXMxoIGxVlAYI+PhIZDY5YjhNAAzA3AgYBCQEBAwmPdwEB
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.78,375,1599523200"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="29025144"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 27 Nov 2020 16:30:57 +0000
Received: from [10.61.164.156] ([10.61.164.156]) by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 0ARGUuWt006722 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 27 Nov 2020 16:30:57 GMT
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Message-Id: <AADEFD92-5873-4D0E-A798-1C31328FF8BC@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_F348C2DD-5CE6-4F35-B7F5-8C277EA53271"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha256"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2020 17:30:56 +0100
In-Reply-To: <04e901d6c4da$192afa90$4b80efb0$@olddog.co.uk>
Cc: rfced-future@iab.org
To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
References: <4A34B713-E013-4A36-9296-694F07EC5AC5@cisco.com> <04e901d6c4da$192afa90$4b80efb0$@olddog.co.uk>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.61.164.156, [10.61.164.156]
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-1.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfced-future/zvOdB1DGPiZe-uDD7-GBFWx7UgA>
Subject: Re: [Rfced-future] ** Consensus check on part of Issue 12: Is the person an advisor (RSA) or an Executive Editor (RSE) **
X-BeenThere: rfced-future@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Editor Future Development Program <rfced-future.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/rfced-future>, <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfced-future/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfced-future@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/rfced-future>, <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2020 16:31:06 -0000

Happy Black Friday to you as well, Adrian.

> On 27 Nov 2020, at 17:26, Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> wrote:
> 
> Hi Eliot,
> 
> Happy Black Friday.
> 
> I found this just a tiny bit ambiguous. I think that, in the context of the subject line, I can work it out. So, to be clear...
> 
> • The chairs think that there is likely rough consensus that role of the chair and the RS[EA] should be split.
> 
> • The chairs think we have consensus that the RS[EA] can raise issues to the strategic group
> 
> • The chairs think there is likely rough consensus that the RS[EA] does not make strategic decisions but that those are decided by the strategic body
> 
> • The chairs think there is likely rough consensus that the RS[EA] does not direct the RPC/REP.
> 
> Right?

Right.

Eliot

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email