IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Rfcplusplus] Sunk cost + not about us

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Tue, 10 July 2018 14:59 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rfcplusplus@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfcplusplus@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3709E131072 for <rfcplusplus@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 07:59:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZO7kLo4qc0mM for <rfcplusplus@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 07:59:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5A3813105F for <rfcplusplus@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 07:59:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3322; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1531234760; x=1532444360; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=kZY+kOsBN0Fj6307NRkfs1BGbfSNm+WPtplSrGl2xDs=; b=dRcWh2CpukoAn8uku69w+KynfIKwzb8UgDq6LOnky7ZUY3pFSial4Rcz 3L2DnzQKg5ZpjqeqWzSfeDPG+HLyKqOzmaBf5Ei5S5BBLaHJUmDtokfYW 3tu6QPWagD4MmsW+SWn1ctquI/KoWg4hbDPAzPLrzOT3dtevZO/9uVCaY 0=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 488
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DzAQByyERb/xbLJq1cGgEBAQEBAgEBAQEIAQEBAYUZEoQiiGONNgiQR4cICAOEbAKCSzgUAQIBAQIBAQJtKIUtCgYjVhALAwEKNAICVwYBDAgBAYMcAYF/qnWBLh+ILoEtD4sPgTcMgl6HfIJVAplSCYNdgViJawaIGIVIkhKBWCGBUjMaCBsVgyWQVD2OGwEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.51,335,1526342400"; d="asc'?scan'208,217";a="5085794"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-3.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Jul 2018 14:59:19 +0000
Received: from [10.61.195.132] ([10.61.195.132]) by aer-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w6AExITw020145; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 14:59:18 GMT
To: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Cc: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>, rfcplusplus@ietf.org
References: <CAL02cgQbT8s0493SdbM7Gbw2ZiSV1kMHk+6=Z4BdC2Ky664CNg@mail.gmail.com> <d159dd1f-de0b-d6c5-6430-cd5577e266fd@joelhalpern.com> <dc8c30ee-8233-e5cc-3afd-4734c1af8b0b@gmail.com> <CAL02cgT5BtFnMHzxpAx7pV=AiRyzMQV3aON65kAPRnV9kFOgeg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Openpgp: preference=signencrypt
Autocrypt: addr=lear@cisco.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= xsBNBFMe1UQBCADdYOS5APDpIpF2ohAxB+nxg1GpAYr8iKwGIb86Wp9NkK5+QwbW9H035clT lpVLciExtN8E3MCTPOIm7aITPlruixAVwlBY3g7U9eRppSw9O2H/7bie2GOnYxqmsw4v1yNZ 9NcMLlD8raY0UcQ5r698c8JD4xUTLqybZXaK2sPeJkxzT+IwupRSQ+vXEvFFGhERQ88zo5Ca Sa1Gw/Rv54oH0Dq2XYkO41rhxQ60BKZLZuQK1d9+1y3I+An3AJeD3AA31fJZD3H8YRKOBgqe ILPILbw1mM7gCtCjfvFCt6AFCwEsjITGx55ceoQ+t5B5XGYJEppMWsIFrwZsfbL+gP31ABEB AAHNJUVsaW90IExlYXIgPGxlYXJAb2Zjb3Vyc2VpbXJpZ2h0LmNvbT7CwJEEEwECADsCGwMC HgECF4ACGQEWIQSY0L2QRh2wkqeyYR2HtmtG2dJ6MwUCWxJwMwULCQgHAgYVCAkKCwIEFgID AQAKCRCHtmtG2dJ6MyMyCACXvtFjAYGMtOkD9MD4nI3ifFpkrj8xTMbXjrv5hdqmzRmQ0wqA 1U/OlZux+P/NaVMiZNZc8zw0nsx/INAqDOVd4/tLWF+ywTkeRFR0VnaUxLwCReZAZOaRS+md +52u/6ddoFja2RnjZ43qbbuvVUARQVIyMJz+GbR6mEZQHR0psD7dDYZDyrpivCxm8zHQwmB6 AZUlO7OJgljDvVPVDCabg/ZnJw1qS0OzSiNb0MySk1D5A7FdwDgeKxuMYUOOoVVTTMWNWcME UkRX9LxElswEt0PQWiz/j3FYXTxiFfl/1vKcHx4pM+E5C5mhTbrdFUFLJC3Y5fLID7stK/Ch aEaBzsBNBFMe1UQBCAC0WV7Ydbv95xYGPhthTdChBIpPtl7JPCV/c6/3iEmvjpfGuFNaK4Ma cj9le20EA5A1BH7PgLGoHOiPM65NysRpZ96RRVX3TNfLmhGMFr5hPOGNdq+xcGHVutmwPV9U 7bKeUNRiPFx3YdEkExddqV2E8FltT0x2FSKe2xszPPHB6gVtMckX5buI9p1K3fbVhXdvEkcY Y/jB0JEJGyhS5aEbct5cHUvDAkT81/YFK5Jfg8RRwu1q1t1YuIJSOWAZQ9J9oUsg6D9RpClU +tIFBoe3iTp1AUfJcypucGKgLYKtpu/aygcpQONHYkYW5003mPsrajFhReVF5veycMbHs4u5 ABEBAAHCwF8EGAECAAkFAlMe1UQCGwwACgkQh7ZrRtnSejOSuQgA27p2rYB7Kh20dym6V8c6 2pWpBHHTgxr/32zevxHSiXl6xvUCg5T8WUwfUk8OvgDcBErK/blDAMXQzSg3sp450JhR8RnX HXF5Zz2T04X7HnlIVJGwf2CjnwyEAJCqMzaCmI+g3Imvg/8L4nyBFvhlFHDv+kIvMiujyycj PAu7xxKplBs1/IEwmDoAMjneFmawvfeQnwdMhSKK8PjKSuzGU5uUmxj3GBfRqvTM0qpmhMPF OmDhJSmH55HLAky2MlmqJYXJPt/9EfSEhFiua1M6gLiuNEuPkp+8jcnHQqKr0IeHt8UqcwLt 2mGfIyl0FVdF9hvWPjNRzGbgqoT1Di03RQ==
Message-ID: <888d8f56-1ae8-4812-c8b2-a0d99ce6edfa@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 16:59:16 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAL02cgT5BtFnMHzxpAx7pV=AiRyzMQV3aON65kAPRnV9kFOgeg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="R2fFSm9qOYwXWsz1Zt1xMQ6vXoXn3RYOP"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfcplusplus/3D8xiy4kzmsqwh73a90kD6dWc9I>
Subject: Re: [Rfcplusplus] Sunk cost + not about us
X-BeenThere: rfcplusplus@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: For discussion of the RFC++ BoF proposal and related ideas <rfcplusplus.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rfcplusplus>, <mailto:rfcplusplus-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfcplusplus/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfcplusplus@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfcplusplus-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rfcplusplus>, <mailto:rfcplusplus-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 14:59:30 -0000

On 10.07.18 16:34, Richard Barnes wrote:

    I have no doubt that we could do better, but so far, nobody's done
    the work.


That seems like a far better place to start in all of this.  In fact, it
would be quite good if this group could even agree on what goo looks
like.  That will also help clarify what measurements are important.

Eliot

v2.28.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status