IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Rfcplusplus] Qualified labels

Alice Russo <arusso@amsl.com> Tue, 10 July 2018 18:41 UTC

Return-Path: <arusso@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: rfcplusplus@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfcplusplus@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 433011311BA for <rfcplusplus@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 11:41:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x3ngnVfOatWM for <rfcplusplus@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 11:40:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE06E131198 for <rfcplusplus@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 11:40:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D7411D1B83; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 11:40:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tZEj8fFbcsfe; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 11:40:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.5.50.125] (70-89-112-166-smc-wa.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [70.89.112.166]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9B7161CA3BA; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 11:40:56 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Alice Russo <arusso@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <10f6771e-7de6-530d-0c7b-4b347a23612c@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 11:40:57 -0700
Cc: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>, rfcplusplus@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <515C68DD-F55F-49E5-97E7-569C0815462B@amsl.com>
References: <888b184e-51ea-23fc-afaa-f9b5116d480a@gmail.com> <0dbf07da-969c-9704-9618-8d3d7ff03004@nostrum.com> <7787043f-1ab0-f957-2d26-e915009c4d3f@nostrum.com> <10f6771e-7de6-530d-0c7b-4b347a23612c@gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfcplusplus/AS_0bfwOluZMD1tV7-LY3cNrISU>
Subject: Re: [Rfcplusplus] Qualified labels
X-BeenThere: rfcplusplus@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: For discussion of the RFC++ BoF proposal and related ideas <rfcplusplus.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rfcplusplus>, <mailto:rfcplusplus-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfcplusplus/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfcplusplus@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfcplusplus-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rfcplusplus>, <mailto:rfcplusplus-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 18:41:14 -0000

On Jul 9, 2018, at 9:53 PM, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> ** However, you have hit upon a bug. The IESG may believe that
> they upgraded RFC5289, but it seems that nobody told the RFC Editor,
> since it is still officially listed as Informational. Even the tracker
> is confused. So we have a procedural glitch in this area already.

Indeed.

I am taking a look at what happened here and will report back.

Thank you.
RFC Editor/ar

v2.27.6 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status