IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Rfcplusplus] Sunk cost + not about us

Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> Tue, 10 July 2018 20:11 UTC

Return-Path: <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rfcplusplus@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfcplusplus@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16AED13104C for <rfcplusplus@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 13:11:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UG_isqnTozZl for <rfcplusplus@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 13:11:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl0-x229.google.com (mail-pl0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44623130FCD for <rfcplusplus@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 13:11:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl0-x229.google.com with SMTP id a7-v6so8094835plp.3 for <rfcplusplus@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 13:11:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=7c/O7VHtgb6/jhCQ6um/KysWS3hQqgPUcEWhre31lM8=; b=fd8lUO+LebYt4ggta+CpRR+i6RfY4z18DmDjxTu9cV8aW70/+8y9ExX+tK6OB2+gIt aU5ladtFakNK3jZ9hNDZYqBrl2pnWdbzBL/d28E/CSgrId874RHFSODmI83wOEPZNtdR NOqrBosemeF/EmrJELtX4l+q256p1MnbuLCRibKfXjzcI/Q08tRtgUNAweu28ovFni6g EDrXQSC0iyfKaPZB5yFKk5pfK+1ZyNfcb0Qqfffep9VZ07+s/73RL/97jHObcAEN62x5 8it/Qlryub1233KYNo31HIj9rJ09Te3i6OPNwmlU1tRH20my+xFJvHsB0JwsEueE+5pC FnTA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=7c/O7VHtgb6/jhCQ6um/KysWS3hQqgPUcEWhre31lM8=; b=uKgfWZ7TcAszLnNXmOPP8VtDuy4Fvt1zER8k2xpeFSeXpst0Sj7aTPz3UZW3cQMLmI upOLxR/bMVhs99PHQAnw76Poj4S7a6fa3s3QzOUm9u1C7c9Bqj/nxeeT3GEiXoybYrQ7 p+pAe2thrW/mMutYe5YtRTZ1/AZWvICfnRc7n2NQmyHDgnwgUcnlBhQ641GUdh1C9LeR dVkU36QqwEvCijp6cX7AXdL/LTIUHBotT1KsdRrWU9OBrkzDlrCVrTLhzS1pUvGhG11Z +q3LlSxUfwQ7meG/RguFJo3SplrHC5RgMFYPyzYJpkQoLeDJ8MLZreKupen2orNeKtVH a2mA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E2JHvKgSI43E1yoaVhusCFfcRyco8Wtuz7LZdQ3FwK1+FT5STex xsS0xpQ1pMzsb15uo1A/rCw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpcTi00SgqAdPbTijfjAq5kjnS0DiMLMk3TFC/ujneKU0T26xo2Ezb8/tY+T1Jhdne+vnNvbiA==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:8607:: with SMTP id f7-v6mr26170517plo.138.1531253516840; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 13:11:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.224.219] ([209.97.127.34]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s12-v6sm27952398pfm.41.2018.07.10.13.11.55 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 10 Jul 2018 13:11:56 -0700 (PDT)
From: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <639B8766-A030-490D-8431-C3F9F3EAFCB4@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_B61330EC-BCE9-42BA-8FC2-4F9A9254D7A7"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 13:11:54 -0700
In-Reply-To: <CAL02cgSoRyRaR+_s3jne=2593f_mtntm-v7Nn=5rDs1_r96pfQ@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>, rfcplusplus@ietf.org
To: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
References: <CAL02cgQbT8s0493SdbM7Gbw2ZiSV1kMHk+6=Z4BdC2Ky664CNg@mail.gmail.com> <d159dd1f-de0b-d6c5-6430-cd5577e266fd@joelhalpern.com> <CAL02cgSoRyRaR+_s3jne=2593f_mtntm-v7Nn=5rDs1_r96pfQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfcplusplus/H_vCBxwChy4wM3k6eswYWTlwDwM>
Subject: Re: [Rfcplusplus] Sunk cost + not about us
X-BeenThere: rfcplusplus@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: For discussion of the RFC++ BoF proposal and related ideas <rfcplusplus.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rfcplusplus>, <mailto:rfcplusplus-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfcplusplus/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfcplusplus@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfcplusplus-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rfcplusplus>, <mailto:rfcplusplus-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 20:11:59 -0000

Richard,

> On Jul 10, 2018, at 7:21 AM, Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 6:32 PM Joel M. Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com <mailto:jmh@joelhalpern.com>> wrote:
> This formulation assumes that change does not have a cost.  It does.  I
> agree that not changing has some cost.  However, absent indication that
> the changes will actually address the claimed problem...
> 
> People are presenting indications.  Attach what caveats you need to my little study; it's still real data from a relevant population.  Do you have better data?


When I saw the survey, after I filled it in, I noticed that I could do it again. There didn’t appear to be a mechanism to keep anyone from taking it multiple times.   Based on this, I don’t think one can draw any conclusions.

Bob

v2.28.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status